Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   How about them Jennifer Lawrence nudes tho??? (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=91902)

anime_boners 09-02-2014 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diode (Post 395095)
I never disagreed with any of that.

I stated that the ideal outcome of this is that people realize storing anything on a remote location, regardless of what the hosting company tells you, carries an inherent risk of exposure. That also goes with sending it to a friend or loved one.

A is very much true - if you don't want the risk of exposure, don't take the photo (0% risk). If you wish to minimize the risk of exposure, don't store it anywhere that isn't local - though that still retains a risk (physical theft, malicious person, etc).

I agree.

I just think there's a tad too much victim blaming going on rn

edit: not saying you were specifically - but in general

Certain 09-02-2014 03:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oats (Post 395077)
I think the actresses in particular make minimal contributions to society, yes. Not to disparage acting, or arts at all, but at this point in time I doubt Jennifer Lawrence ... will go down in the annals of acting history as people who penetrated our social fabric meaningfully.

Jennifer Lawrence is 24 years old and probably the biggest actress in the world right now. She's beloved, particularly by girls but by women in general. She's already been lead in blockbusters and highly respected artistic movies, and her lead character in The Hunger Games is viewed as a good role model for young girls.

Ghost1 09-02-2014 03:30 PM

@Diode to link me aubrey plaza butthole

Lucos 09-02-2014 03:33 PM

anyone got michelle keegan yet? shes been all over the british papers but still havent seen the terries

Lucos 09-02-2014 03:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Certain (Post 395184)
Jennifer Lawrence is 24 years old and probably the biggest actress in the world right now. She's beloved, particularly by girls but by women in general. She's already been lead in blockbusters and highly respected artistic movies, and her lead character in The Hunger Games is viewed as a good role model for young girls.

/feminist propoganda

Batty 09-02-2014 03:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diode (Post 395069)
only the censored gif'd screencap version is out still tho right

So far, I've seen 2 versions of that tbh. One with boxes over it and one blurred.

But yeah, waiting on the legit vid for sure.

Batty 09-02-2014 03:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucos (Post 395229)
/feminist propoganda


Agreed. Bottom line is Lawrence and Upton are killing it on all top searches, they will no doubt benefit from this more than anything else.

http://www.bing.com/images

@Witty Wonka, peep foxes dominating animal searches, coyotes beating wolves too, wut!

But yeah, news sites are all painting these chicks as the victims, they really can't lose and all thanks to The Fappening.

veritas 09-02-2014 03:39 PM

P.T. Barnum effect guise.

#positivefoxtags

Lucos 09-02-2014 03:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batty (Post 395234)
Agreed. Bottom line is Lawrence and Upton are killing it on all top searches, they will no doubt benefit from this more than anything else.

http://www.bing.com/images

@Witty Wonka, peep foxes dominating animal searches, coyotes beating wolves too, wut!

But yeah, news sites are all painting these chicks as the victims, they really can't lose and all thanks to The Fappening.

all i see in the last few months no matter what news website (barring russia today) is feminist bullshit, its starting to piss me off. fair enough, gays got rights. ADVERTISIING women/faggots as being somehow BETTER than straight male men, is bullshit. kate moss recently admitted to assaulting 2 ex boyfriends who are both famous, and there was no news articles or backlash. theres a clear agenda going on.

Certain 09-02-2014 03:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucos (Post 395243)
kate moss recently admitted to assaulting 2 ex boyfriends who are both famous, and there was no news articles

So then how did you hear about it?

veritas 09-02-2014 03:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Certain (Post 395246)
So then how did you hear about it?

http://imagizer.imageshack.us/a/img191/974/zh4f.gif

Lucos 09-02-2014 03:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Certain (Post 395246)
So then how did you hear about it?

4chan

Lucos 09-02-2014 03:53 PM

and its my view that there was only a news article because 4chan is in the public domain right now due to all this jennifer lawless or whatever scandal, which kate moss is involved in.

Batty 09-02-2014 04:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Lucos (Post 395243)
all i see in the last few months no matter what news website (barring russia today) is feminist bullshit, its starting to piss me off. fair enough, gays got rights. ADVERTISIING women/faggots as being somehow BETTER than straight male men, is bullshit. kate moss recently admitted to assaulting 2 ex boyfriends who are both famous, and there was no news articles or backlash. theres a clear agenda going on.

Bro, did you see all the backlash for the cover of the new spider-woman comic?

They drew her like female characters have always looked in comics, now people are flipping out saying it's sexist.

Then they do videos to show how her body is posed unrealistically lol.

have they never seen Spider-Man poses?

A SUPERHUMAN SPIDER-PERSON IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE REALISTIC.

Certain 09-02-2014 05:11 PM

@Batty, the most intense of that criticism isn't about sexism, and it's not coming from feminists. It's coming because there's no way a neck should work like that. It's coming from hard-core Marvel fans and even Rob Liefeld.

This is the cover, for those who haven't seen it:

http://i.imgur.com/BnnNYRR.jpg

PancakeBrah 09-02-2014 05:13 PM

My life is a sham.

veritas 09-02-2014 05:24 PM

that suit looks stupid.

big baby 09-02-2014 05:25 PM

tbh in a war of straight male vs gay men lesbians and straight woman it'd be complete slaughter. unless they got chimps on their side

Diode 09-02-2014 05:33 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Certain (Post 395304)
@Batty, the most intense of that criticism isn't about sexism, and it's not coming from feminists. It's coming because there's no way a neck should work like that. It's coming from hard-core Marvel fans and even Rob Liefeld.

This is the cover, for those who haven't seen it:

http://i.imgur.com/BnnNYRR.jpg

rob liefield approves.

Batty 09-02-2014 05:57 PM

@Diode, Naw bro, trust there's been lots more criticism than that...


http://www.vox.com/xpress/2014/8/20/...n-cover-sexist

I mean, as Spider-Woman, that's not even an unbelievable pose. Spider-Man himself has pulled off way more unbelievable poses. Rob Liefeld can eat a dick tho, that nigga just can't draw. That nigga draws 2 left hands and shit with a broken backwards mini-leg stump. That Spider-Woman would be the greatest thing he ever drew.

You gotta peep the Youtube videos of chunky feminists trying to do the pose.



Quote:

that suit looks stupid.

that's the classic suit she's worn forever too lol.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:25 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.