So what if he invented the sport.

James Naismith would get destroyed by Earl Boykins.

Id tear Milton and Bradley up in a game of Sorry.

Things evolve.

Milton and bradley, roftf

Dunno if its been asked but are we talking boxing here or what?

Or just like, if they threw hands in a bar?

Cuz if so, Lars would win.

Really though...what sort of fight?

Just like they met in an alley and decided to throw

imagin roy givin that fool overhand rights

while he's tryna get close and set up for a 3 in punch

seriously, the question should be whether Roy would kill him or not

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lIPAvP-dAFs

Ehhh.

I'd probably lean towards Roy Jones for that tbh.

One punch.

man I'm still tryna find that one clip where Roy punched the dude so fast he was on the ground like

http://imageshack.us/a/img151/4940/s...er705filen.png

@J. Metts might know what I'm talmbout

Cute babies will not win you this argument.

Reminds me of the snl Ditka skit...
Roy jones junior vs god...
But roy jones junior is blindfolded -to make it more fair...

Just to reiterate, Roy Jones would kill Bruce Lee dead.

eddie you act like roy could do more then punch, thats it thats all he can do.. he can hit fast. bruce lee could hit fast and hard.

Literally one of the worst arguments I've read on the internet.

Bruce Lee is a fabrication of space and time and asians. He is 50% aura, 40% myth, and 10% Kareem Abdul Jabbar.

Roy Jones fought for a living and was one of the better boxers in history. Bruce Lee made movies. He is an action figure. His kung-fu grip is all puppetry.

munster your sounding daf right now tbh..

it's like putting a boxer against an mma fighter.... what happened when that went down? exactly..

bruce lee is much more diverse and fluent in fighting than a boxer is

bruce lee has an EXPANSIVE background in martial arts where as a boxer is trained only in one specific style.. i.e boxing.

-
-
-
-

so what 100 legends of martial arts says is false?

some of th ebest ever says bruce lee was a bad ass dude

but i guess there false? why because you can pick up a bar bell? gtfo of here with that.

No, because he protected his tootsie rolls against vagrant forces.. Now he's end all, know all.

GoW that is an ad hominem and would be thrown out of any formal debate.

any thing in this thread is simply speculation as to who would win. but as far as ability it isnt

plus this arguement is as dumb as the jordan/bryant arguement or even worse the text worlds shortbar /longbar arguement

its all personal opinion.

Jordan/Kobe isn't an argument.