DEFLECTION*

Am I doing it right?

Absolutely right and I suspected you'd say that I'd deny denial.. But it's rather the suspicion of it actually being false than me being in denial. When it comes down to it and me being awake contemplating my issues along with questions that spawn from existential crisis I often come to conclusions and I've never denied reality or felt out of place beacause of my ''fate'' (if you want to call it that). I understand what these negative experiences has done and I understand the way I've reacted and what has happened due to them. I'm awake because I continue to ponder in order to fully understand what I'm dealing with rather than denying them. What's keeping me up is too much energy and trying to make sure I am a worthy human being that adds to society and life, rather than looking upon myself as a leech to humanity. It's kinda the opposite of denial, if that makes any sense. I just want to progress as a being.

Also; I've been prescribed Vallergan. Seems to be working. I've had a few great nights of sleep due to them.

We need someone to break down and admit to Veritas diagnoses for this thread to really take life.

lmaooo

*ERECTION

YES!

See denial.
See repression

does this mean I win because I caught 'em all?

POKEMON MASTER STATUS, YO!

" I am illiterate, and the fact that I am able to write sentences that I am unable to read or understand, proves evolution...something coming from nothing randomly for no good reason. "

Veritas question out of curiosity. You would have studied evolutionary psychology considering it as a framework is present especially within development, neuro and abnormal psychology stuff. How do you address the conflict between your personal beliefs about no evolution and the presence of evolutionary psychology within basically most major fields of psychology in some way?

Also, considering you would have come across evolutionary psychology at some time and read about it, how do you write such a incorrect conceptualization of evolution such as "something coming from nothing randomly for no good reason." Surely, even if you disagree it would be on a specific point and not on such a complete misunderstanding of a basic concept.

good start...what do you believe your fate is?

this is a good question, especially after having to ignore the subtle attack in the stability of my belief system sir. Unfortunatly you feel this way due to simply not paying attention, as I stated in the GOD exists thread that I do believe in evolution of mind (I even stated: you are not the same person you were as a teenager, or something to that extent), just not in one species slowly, or magically, turning into another species entirely sir.

so perhaps the question here actually is, how are you unable to delienate the intellectual difference in mental/spiritual evolution or even personal evolution, with the Theory of evolution as an explanation for the existence of humanity?

They are completely different, I'm referring to things like evolutionary neuroscience, behavioral genetics, evolutionary developmental psychology. These all address gradual change in species over time through the process of natural selection. They use study of that gradual change to explain how current brain structures/developmental patterns currently exist. I mean you should know basic things similar to that, how do you write things like evolution is "something coming from nothing randomly for no good reason. " which is big misunderstanding and incorrect representation when you would have studied evolution?

ctfu

Easily. Everything you are describing is adaptation.

I am saying a fish turning into a bird into a monkey into a man is impossible. Natural selection has notjingto do with that.

I believe in adapting I believe in the brain evolvong thru neurogenesis and plasticity...but that all has notjing to do with monkey man.

veritas comes out of the closet as a creationist and/or ID-thumper ITT

I believe that God made everyrhing after its own kind.

"Easily. Everything you are describing is adaptation.

I am saying a fish turning into a bird into a monkey into a man is impossible. Natural selection has notjingto do with that.

I believe in adapting I believe in the brain evolvong thru neurogenesis and plasticity...but that all has notjing to do with monkey man. "

So you accept the mechanism of evolution but not the process of evolution. What justification (other than "God made in it's own kind") do you provide for placing a limitation on the mechanism of gradual adaption over time? If the mechanism for gradual adaptation is valid what reason other than "made in its own kind" could one species with two different and separate sets of conditions selecting different adaptions over time not diverge into distinct species? It seems kind of irrational like accepting in minutes exist but not hours and grams exist but not kilograms.

V/ zygote

Veritas steady taking L's

Go on..

you ignored
me