Netcees - ay bernie completely torched this fox news townhall i'm in disbelief

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)

- Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)

- - ay bernie completely torched this fox news townhall i'm in disbelief (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=140077)

So, it’s more logical to allow life to suffer than prevent it from ever existing, in the new post 80s college logic?

Quote:

Originally Posted by seth (Post 736890)

And once again, you fail to be able to think critically and after multiple attempts to get it through your small brain IM NOT ADVOCATING ABORTIONS BEING ILLEGAL YOU DUMB ASS.

Well, why not? You said it’s murder
In the new logic is murder cool now?

I would prefer any mother that would throw a baby in a dumpster kill themselves

I don’t think prioritizing either of the scenarios you want to contrast is a moral thing to do. Bad things exist, it might be a positive thing to not call things “lesser evils” and make them acceptable. Again, you nimwit, I don’t think abortion should be illegal. You can’t kill an idea. You can’t ban things central to a way of cultural life. Etc. Idk what point you think you’re making, but you’re not being zany or intellectual so if that’s your purpose of the last few strings of poop mouth it’s okay to swallow it.

Is swallowing murder?!

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 736892)

Well, why not? You said it’s murder
In the new logic is murder cool now?

As long as they can vote for the bern

Hey, you’re the guy who obviously isn’t even non-pussy enough to take your own belief to its conclusion. If you think abortion is murder, you should be for the outlawing of abortion entirely. If you don’t, you clearly have no true moral ground to stand on.

Which isn’t news to me either

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 736898)

I think some murder is justified. Call it what you will.

And you now understand that it’s your position as a pro-choice advocate?

We differ on the point of life beginning

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 736906)

We differ on the point of life beginning

I provided biological evidence of a realistic start to life. Where is yours?

Do we agree or differ on abortions being okay to save the physical life of the mother, in the event the fetus is dead, or will be physically deformed or ill and suffer outside of the womb? And that other abortions aren’t actually necessary with all of the modern birth controls?

Quote:

Originally Posted by Immolate (Post 736787)

politics are for poor people

im actually working with a guy who ran for governor once. god i wish he wasnt so old. would run him again and run his campaign.

sjw fags can suck it, bernie won't ever win. Trump will win 2020 unless dems steal it with illegals voting and fake ballots. that's a fact

MAGA

Quote:

Originally Posted by seth (Post 736909)

I provided biological evidence of a realistic start to life. Where is yours?

When one gets a job

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 736930)

When one gets a job

Laughable example

@Finnydot

Evidence refuted

It's over. You got triggered and then owned. Checkmate.

Lol. How many times do I have to tell you, you’re not worth arguing with?
You’re coming from the viewpoint of “murder is bad except when I say it’s not”
We’re going to have to agree to disagree

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 736947)

>tiny mind

>cannot compute

>havent seen on buzzfeed

>exit

murder is bad when he says so dumb
elimination is okay when I say so v smart

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diode (Post 736854)

Marijuana remains Schedule 1 at the federal level and is federally illegal to own, possess, distribute, manufacture, etc. in all 50 states. State laws and federal laws come into conflict frequently. The willingness to bring those laws to trial is what decides whether or not something remains in conflict. For marijuana, the DOJ has erred on the side of not challenging the states but rather prosecuting individuals.

For late term abortions, you can bet your ass a mother trying to leverage loose language to abort for any reason other than what Roe set precedent for would have an army of lawyers descend upon the statehouse faster than she could take a breath.

I never told you that you couldn't have an opinion (hence stating that none of this argument even makes sense since morally you are opposed to all abortions). And I simply pointed out that no state legislator intended for a protective state law to be misconstrued to legalize all late term abortions. Unfortunately, the sqwakboxes on the right chose to spin it that way.

You and Des and Bern and Boof are its own thing and I ain't touching it.

1. I respect the brown belt. However I must challenge your tone that your “research” is absolute on this. The more you speak the more you drift into political agenda/opinion Chris.

2. I don’t know if you can blame the right wing squak boxes for spinning, when that senator literally said he wanted the bill to allow the child to be born, and kept comfy while the mother and doctor decide whether to murder, I mean terminate it.

Fair?

Quote:

Originally Posted by PancakeBrah (Post 737007)

Not sure who I agree with yet. Compelling arguments on both sides. Give me a few more posts each.

Roe v Wade and planned parenthood were created to control the population in black communities.