When him and Roy fought, IMO. Benard wasn't even that nice to begin with, IMO.


Listen, all of these arguments are matters of OPINION in which everyone is entitled too. No REAL FACTS behind anyone's posts. It's all a matter of opinion.

You said Bernard lost to Roy when Bernard was out of his prime

Roy Jones beat Hopkins in 1993 with one arm, you do not watch boxing, and at this point it is obv

you neglected to label trinidad as "past prime" even tho it doesn't matter because they both were

You said felix was his only decent win when there are clearly hall of famers on the list I posted

there are hofer's I neglected to post because I figured you never heard of them

but apparently you haven't heard of these guys either

stop talking about boxing guy

Lmao, alright.

no excuse me, it is a fact that roy beat hall of famers and Bruce didn't

and we are discussing fights

one acted for money

the other fought for money

Bruce has never fought a man with the skill set or legacy of Roy Jones Jr, why people talk as if its the other way around it what makes me continue to name call

I'm not laughin or nothing

dog, explain howtf I'm trolling?

lol, man how many times u make this same thread

n then u dispute the fuck out ne one who argues against u

kinda obv

I made one thread ever about Roy vs bruce

and me disputing things with quality info, material facts etc.. I'm not understanding how thats considered a troll

Arguing about Bruce vs Roy Jones is pointless, IMO. Like I've said on numerous accounts, it's all a matter of opinion and would never happen.


Let's choose a topic WORTH disputing. Possibly 2 fighters that are currently holding down their fighting genre and weight class.

Example,

Anderson Silva vs GSP

bro uve made way more then 1 lmfao

ive seen

tyson v bruce

tyson v rjj

rjj v bruce

like 3x esp on 1.0

Dude has the same birthday as me. Word.

Shit's wild. Jersey Cops are ruthless too and so are their Judges.