Netcees
Page 5 of 15 « First 34 5 67 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Induct me into the HOF (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=24557)

PancakeBrah 10-11-2013 11:42 PM
I wouldn't say fuck it.

Open Mic is secondary, yes. Neighbor deserves his panel, too. To disregard your candidacy, though, is incorrect.

A set panel and possible site wide vote wouldn't be so bad, come to think of it.

Beyond 10-11-2013 11:46 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PancakeBrah (Post 176745)
Who's on these panels usually? Admins and HOF members? I can organize it.

I made a topic for Black in the admin lounge but it's far from official.
The counsel last time for Bags was me, Knuck, Hush, Orc, God of War, namix, Joe Metts, trap and Meth was the tiebreaker vote.

Meth 10-11-2013 11:47 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beyond (Post 176806)
The counsel last time for Bags was me, Knuck, Hush, Orc, God of War, namix, Joe Metts, trap and Meth was the tiebreaker vote.
I was not the tie breaker.

My vote was not official.

Knuck asked like 5 unoffici voters to give their opinion and then he was the tie breKer vote... So basically knuckle got 2 votes

PancakeBrah 10-11-2013 11:49 PM
Current HOF members and Admins seem like a good criteria, with an additional vote as the majority opinion of a vote held in Discussion open to everyone excluding the panel. If it's an even number we bring in a tiebreaker vote, someone respected.

oats 10-11-2013 11:51 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PancakeBrah (Post 176811)
Current HOF members and Admins seem like a good criteria, with an additional vote as the majority opinion of a vote held in Discussion open to everyone excluding the panel. If it's an even number we bring in a tiebreaker vote, someone respected.

I think this is the winner.

Meth 10-11-2013 11:53 PM
Quote:
Originally Posted by PancakeBrah (Post 176811)
Current HOF members and Admins seem like a good criteria, with an additional vote as the majority opinion of a vote held in Discussion open to everyone excluding the panel. If it's an even number we bring in a tiebreaker vote, someone respected.
The battle hall of famers would be biased against a topical candidate

Imo

PancakeBrah 10-12-2013 12:04 AM
Tiebreaker vote goes to someone topical/open mic inclined.

Admins have a topical base, or no base at all, for the most part.

Some HOF members are level headed enough to respect open mic talent. Some.

If the voting seems biased a super admin can pull strings, I suppose.

oats 10-12-2013 12:19 AM
if anything, we should def be a little more active in nominating/inducting people. On planetrap I recall that there would be two times a year when inductions were considered (every 6 months). Don't have to induct every nominee, just nice to keep it updated at least semi-regularly.

El Muffin 10-12-2013 12:22 AM
Im pretty unbiased when it comes to voting and such things. Id be willing ti be apart of such panel if yall wiuld gave me..i talk shit about oms but i respect them all the same esp when you guys txt legacues are involved

Ive been apart of a cpl of those in the past as well

El Muffin 10-12-2013 12:25 AM
Jesus fat fingers on phone too lazy to edit syndrome plz forgivr

Meth 10-12-2013 12:41 AM
I don't think u been around enough to be on a panel bro

Pent uP 10-12-2013 12:44 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Split Eight (Post 176109)
v/ yes

fucking let us add entries for writers as well as battlers. Black would be the 1st choice obv. then we'd start going by champeds/ accomps/ OM HoFs/ tourney wins, but only for the new Netcees so we dont have the circle jerk thats going on with the text HOF

and PenT would get inducted/grandfathered in as well for being the only writer in the text HOF


@Meth
@God Of War
@knucklehead
The wording here makes both my heart melt and blood boil

El Muffin 10-12-2013 12:47 AM
N i dont think uve been here nearly long enough. I have eyes youbknow ..n im fully capable of discerning what is good and what is not. Like i said ive been on several panels before ion why my inactivity would mean anything..

Text gasnt went thru a major transformation either. Its beenvthe same since 2000

BWHAHA 10-12-2013 12:48 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by oats (Post 176280)
Easy in imo
u said in twice cause imo is in my opinion smh oat

Pent uP 10-12-2013 12:49 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beyond (Post 176494)
Black my boy and one of the best topical to ever do it, but I have to agree with Orc here.

Back on IHH when you were inducted, you did a LOT more to get in than on NC. You were also one of the best reg battlers on that site, too, and didn't no show nearly as much.

People like Bags, Orc, etc had to do so much to get into the HOF, just doesn't seem fair if you can get in by battling a few times and droppings a couple Open Mics.

I also disagree with the OM cats in this thread, most top tier battlers are just as good if not better than most OM heads. Orc, Bags, Hush, nik, ALIEN, Lefty, etc had OM HOF's on old NC or champed big topical tournies. Just because they mostly battle don't mean they suck at writing.
This is my standpoint sans hish bags alien lefty being anywhere near good@topicals

Certain 10-12-2013 12:50 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWHAHA (Post 176898)
u said in twice cause imo is in my opinion smh oat
You also said "in" twice.

oats 10-12-2013 12:52 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by BWHAHA (Post 176898)
u said in twice cause imo is in my opinion smh oat
It's still correct; I was saying he's an easy in, meaning it is a no-brainer for him to be in. This, of course, is all...in my opinion ;)

Meth 10-12-2013 12:55 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muff (Post 176896)
N i dont think uve been here nearly long enough. I have eyes youbknow ..n im fully capable of discerning what is good and what is not. Like i said ive been on several panels before ion why my inactivity would mean anything..

Text gasnt went thru a major transformation either. Its beenvthe same since 2000
I meant like... Recently...

Lol.

BWHAHA 10-12-2013 12:56 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by Certain (Post 176901)
You also said "in" twice.
Quote:
Originally Posted by oats (Post 176902)
It's still correct; I was saying he's an easy in, meaning it is a no-brainer for him to be in. This, of course, is all...in my opinion ;)
dont gang up on mi i was juzt saying -__________- cnt do nothing.

BWHAHA 10-12-2013 12:58 AM
Quote:
Originally Posted by oats (Post 176902)
It's still correct; I was saying he's an easy in, meaning it is a no-brainer for him to be in. This, of course, is all...in my opinion ;)
WHOA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I SAW WUT I DID THERE!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! LMAO!!!!!!!!!!

OATS HOF 4 WITTINESS ..........

IN ...

;p)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:01 AM.
Page 5 of 15 « First 34 5 67 Last »
Show 40 post(s) from this thread on one page

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.