and where did they come from?

evolution isn't about genesis, VERITAS, it's about progression

I thought diode said that humans hadnt evolved in a long time?

it's a slow process

^this sounds like something that would be fonted onto a starbucks barista's apron.

where did he say anything about homo sapiens sapiens?

No, play fair. I'll answer your questions regardless of whether I perceive them to be pointless, but only if you do the same.

So Answer my question. Could a Mexican hairless dog evolve into something like a St. Bernard?

well, I thought evolution was telescopic in nature? I mean it seems that every "jump" takes less and less time.


what if I am actually the next evolution of man? Too soon?

already answered it. i weep for your lack of reading comprehension.

Where did DNA come from?

you can say whatever you want about it, but all of your questions point towards a beginning, and those answers no one has. it's too far back. all we can look at is the existing fossil record, which is horribly incomplete. but, from what we can see, evolution makes sense. There's at least SOME evidence for it. As opposed to the evidence that God made us in a garden, which there is none.

I honestly do not know. I know that they are both dogs so if enough of them banged they might make babies that were like a hybrid of both. akso, if mexico suddenly developed an artic climate they might adapt and start growing hair and maybe growing in time. fair?

Where did the single cell organism come from?

now you are being honest and putting down the agenda and your hate for "religion" good. you are closer now to enlightenment then ever before. stay with it.


how can no one know the beginning, but at the same time know what the beginning wasnt?

plus I have already said that there was a world on earth before this, which the Bible plainly speaks about.

So is it possible that maybe you are putting your blind faith in something, just as you think I am as well?

Is that a fair statement?

bro that's all any of us can do
but I'm putting my faith behind today's scientists, not ancient wizards

which fallacy is it where you leave out the whole second half of the statement?

I honestly do not know. I know that they are both dogs so if enough of them banged they might make babies that were like a hybrid of both. akso, if mexico suddenly developed an artic climate they might adapt and start growing hair and maybe growing in time. fair?

cmon now, arent ancient wizards the scientists of their day?

Didnt the great sci-fi writer hubbard say that all magic is merely advanced technology?