Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Vaccine makes woman krump endlessly (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=146778)

Coop 01-15-2021 11:54 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798386)
Assuming I take the this premise at face value, how do you account for the fact that the number of "wrongly attributed" deaths is increasing at an alarming rate. 4000 people are dying every day of something. That's a freaky number of non-covid deaths with flu like symptoms.

4,000/day isn’t that wild, it’s about half the normal deaths per day. This would go some length towards explaining the low number of flu deaths.

Also you have to factor in age. Look up the age statistics of these 4,000 per day, then compare the ratios to the age ratios of the country. The result is clear and obvious.

Another situation - you have someone who is elderly, dying from some terminal illness. They catch covid, or have a false positive, but really die from their terminal illness. These situations would be labeled as a covid death.

Coop 01-16-2021 12:53 AM

"Norway Sounds Alarm After 23 Die Following Pfizer Vaccine"

https://latest-today-news.com/2021/0...fizer-vaccine/

fraze 01-16-2021 06:17 AM

This is a hilarious level of hypocrisy.

"We should complete ignore fatalities in one group of people because they're elderly and sick anyway.

But when it benefits my point of view, we definitely need to pay attention to deaths among the elderly and sick."

And please quote from sources with actual journalists next time. What the fuck is a "latest-today-news.com". You sicken me.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...tients-over-80

Coop 01-16-2021 10:50 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798398)
This is a hilarious level of hypocrisy.

"We should complete ignore fatalities in one group of people because they're elderly and sick anyway.

But when it benefits my point of view, we definitely need to pay attention to deaths among the elderly and sick."

And please quote from sources with actual journalists next time. What the fuck is a "latest-today-news.com". You sicken me.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/artic...tients-over-80

“If you can’t attack the message, attack the messenger”



Look at this:

1) Fraze looks at link
2) Instead of looking at subject matter, immediately looks at source
3) Fraze doesn’t recognize the source, immediately assumes subject matter is incorrect



Lmaooo I deliberately picked some random site I never heard of because I knew this would be your reaction. There are plenty of other reputable sites reporting on this, just go search it. I’m playing chess, you on checkers.


Once you realize that, realize you’ve been doing this THE ENTIRE TIME. It’s why you’ve been wrong so much

Lol @ “use real sources” and you post a story saying the same shit as the “fake source”. Lmaooo

Ajax 01-16-2021 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 798392)
Another situation - you have someone who is elderly, dying from some terminal illness. They catch covid, or have a false positive, but really die from their terminal illness. These situations would be labeled as a covid death.

That’s a gross misinterpretation of how determining cause of death works, particularly the importance of underlying causes. When someone stops breathing because they have emphysema, their heart stops and they die. Primary cause is either respiratory failure or cardiac arrest, depending on how technical the coroner wants to be. Underlying cause is emphysema. You can make the same analogy using virtually all natural deaths. Just because emphysema wasn’t the primary cause doesn’t make it any less important.

In your example, if someone was dying of malignant cancer, and caught COVID, but was asymptomatic and it didn’t impact his health at all.. and he then died from cancer.. COVID would not be listed as a primary OR underlying cause of death. But, if he caught COVID and it did hasten or have a role in causing his death, it would be listed appropriately as a cause of the death.

It’s true that most of the time, COVID is listed as an underlying cause of death. But just because it’s listed as an underlying cause of death rather than the primary doesn’t mean it wasn’t caused by COVID. That’s the way the disease works. It’s analogous to how HIV/AIDS and myriad other diseases work. They’re no less dangerous because they are a domino in the middle or at the end. What’s important is that it was part of the cause.

Making the blanket statement you did shows an extreme misunderstanding of the diagnosis process... and of how illnesses, particularly COVID, work to kill someone.

(Unless you’re trying to say that medical professionals are committing fraud on a global scale and adding COVID as a cause of death when it wasn’t. That’s a whole different issue.)

Fracture 01-16-2021 03:12 PM

I agree with ajax

Entirely

Coop 01-16-2021 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajax (Post 798406)
That’s a gross misinterpretation of how determining cause of death works, particularly the importance of underlying causes. When someone stops breathing because they have emphysema, their heart stops and they die. Primary cause is either respiratory failure or cardiac arrest, depending on how technical the coroner wants to be. Underlying cause is emphysema. You can make the same analogy using virtually all natural deaths. Just because emphysema wasn’t the primary cause doesn’t make it any less important.

In your example, if someone was dying of malignant cancer, and caught COVID, but was asymptomatic and it didn’t impact his health at all..

First bold is acknowledging that, at the end of the day, immediate, intermediate, and underlying causes can be changed based on "how technical they wanted to be" as opposed to a rigid system that demands accuracy. This will be proven wrong shortly.


Second bold is ridiculous, as covid affects you when you catch it regardless of your symptoms. They would list covid in some capacity if covid was detected at all.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajax (Post 798406)
and he then died from cancer.. COVID would not be listed as a primary OR underlying cause of death. But, if he caught COVID and it did hasten or have a role in causing his death, it would be listed appropriately as a cause of the death.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5Vxf7ed3jBE

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/covid19/cod...-reporting.htm

So here's a 3:06 video, that's on the cdcs website, literally walking you through how to properly list cause of deaths as it pertains to covid 19.

1:11 "If covid 19 is determined to be the underlying cause, it should be reported as the lowest line used in part one, with any conditions with which it gave rise, such as pneumonia or respiratory-distress, in a logical sequence on the lines above"

So no, they cant just list it how they want.

Listen to the hypothetical situation they give starting at 1:33. Pay attention to what's mentioned 1:48-1:53.

That's the glaring issue.


Quote:

Originally Posted by Ajax (Post 798406)
It’s true that most of the time, COVID is listed as an underlying cause of death. But just because it’s listed as an underlying cause of death rather than the primary doesn’t mean it wasn’t caused by COVID. That’s the way the disease works. It’s analogous to how HIV/AIDS and myriad other diseases work. They’re no less dangerous because they are a domino in the middle or at the end. What’s important is that it was part of the cause.

Making the blanket statement you did shows an extreme misunderstanding of the diagnosis process... and of how illnesses, particularly COVID, work to kill someone.

(Unless you’re trying to say that medical professionals are committing fraud on a global scale and adding COVID as a cause of death when it wasn’t. That’s a whole different issue.)

I have a pretty good understanding of it. They just came out with some new ICD covid codes this month, but prior to that... read what code was used.

https://www.icd10data.com/ICD10CM/Co...U49/U07-/U07.1

Specifically "U07.1 is a billable/specific ICD-10-CM code that can be used to indicate a diagnosis for reimbursement purposes." (In case you didn't think hospitals were getting paid for covid deaths)

Every "covid death" being reported on the news has that U07.1 code.

https://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/icd/CO...ines-final.pdf

Here are the guidelines used. Notice on the very first page,

"Code only a confirmed diagnosis of the 2019 novel coronavirus disease (COVID-19) as documented by the provider, documentation of a positive COVID-19 test result, or a presumptive positive COVID-19 test result. For a confirmed diagnosis, assign code U07.1, COVID-19. This is an exception to the hospital inpatient guideline Section II, H. In this context, “confirmation” does not require documentation of the type of test performed; the provider’s documentation that the individual has COVID-19 is sufficient.

Presumptive positive COVID-19 test results should be coded as confirmed. A presumptive positive test result means an individual has tested positive for the virus at a local or state level, but it has not yet been confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC confirmation of local and state tests for COVID-19 is no longer required."

I trust you can comprehend what this means.

In response to your "fraud" mention, no I don't think doctors all over the world are in on it. In fact, I think there's large portions of doctors opposed to things like the vaccine. As shown by the recent reports of how many healthcare workers specifically are refusing it.

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news...ggles-n1252617
https://nypost.com/2021/01/01/alarmi...id-19-vaccine/
https://www.latimes.com/california/s...vaccine-access


What does it say when a ton of medical professionals who deal with covid up close and personal every day, refuse to take the covid vaccine??


Back to the point, there is INCENTIVE, and humans, are GREEDY by nature. And some are simply opportunistic.

https://www.hrsa.gov/coviduninsuredc...sked-questions

Here, take a look at a $2 billion dollar fund set up for reimbursing covid care providers. Scroll through, but notice the "what services are ineligible for reimbursement" section. Basically, if they don't have a positive covid test, NOTHING.

I've already provided proof how inaccurate the PCR test is. And that's the key to this whole thing. But it's not fraud if they aren't doing it intentionally.

I have seen testimony and articles of physicians being pressured by their bosses to list covid 19 when there wasn't any back in APRIL. Whether that happens a lot or a little, and for what reasons, I don't claim to know.

Destroyer 01-16-2021 03:22 PM

oh are healthcare workers refusing it? healthcare workers can be morons too.

Coop 01-16-2021 03:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 798410)
oh are healthcare workers refusing it? healthcare workers can be morons too.

But i thought it was "I TRUST THE SCIENCE"

Are they not medical professionals with a larger working knowledge on the scientific subject matter than you?

Coop 01-16-2021 03:44 PM

https://www.state.gov/fact-sheet-act...e-of-virology/

Pretty interesting how the US Government put out a statement yesterday that links the Wuhan Instititue of Virology (A supposed civilian institute, also where covid "originated") with secret projects with the CCP military.

"Despite the WIV presenting itself as a civilian institution, the US has determined that the WIV has collaborated on publications and secret projects with China's military... ...since at least 2017"

"Today's revelations just scrach the surface of what is still hidden about COVID-19's origin in China."

"The United States will... ...including by continuing to demand transparency on the part of Chinese authorities."


This supports the theory of COVID being manmade don't you think? Remember the whistleblower Dr Li-Meng Yan who said it was?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9J4aEcuEGWs

If there ever is a ww3, biological and cyberwarfare would be the primary/initial methods of attack, not necessarily physical invasion. Just saying.

And now yesterday the government is basically saying they're suspicious as fuck of this institute and the virus' origin.

I wonder if anyone will call the department of state conspiracy theorists?

dull boy 01-16-2021 04:41 PM

Chyeah, you tell ‘em, Coop.

fraze 01-16-2021 06:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 798404)
“If you can’t attack the message, attack the messenger”



Look at this:

1) Fraze looks at link
2) Instead of looking at subject matter, immediately looks at source
3) Fraze doesn’t recognize the source, immediately assumes subject matter is incorrect



Lmaooo I deliberately picked some random site I never heard of because I knew this would be your reaction. There are plenty of other reputable sites reporting on this, just go search it. I’m playing chess, you on checkers.


Once you realize that, realize you’ve been doing this THE ENTIRE TIME. It’s why you’ve been wrong so much

Lol @ “use real sources” and you post a story saying the same shit as the “fake source”. Lmaooo

I never said it incorrect, I just said it was a bad source of news.

This is what we call the "strawman fallacy". You accusing me of doing some bad thing that you've invented (assuming your source is incorrect and not reading it) just so you can take me down for it. It's a favorite rhetorical technique of our current President.


I'm telling you to quote reputable sources because otherwise its just an article on some website. Just because someone understands Wordpress doesn't make them a subject matter expert. Do better.

I read your article, noticed the lack of basic information that would be included in any news story, then I went to find out what was actually happening.

When you finish playing board games, maybe you'll realize I posted the same thing from a reputable source to show that the "mainstream" media is reporting on this because its a legitimate story.

Don't find it strange that new world order is allowing this story on vaccination deaths? Isn't that against the pro-vaccine narrative the powers at be are trying to push in your conspiracy fantasy? Why report on this anti-vaccine story but not the BS you're pulling out of Youtube videos.

It's because real journalists have to verify a story from multiple sources before their editors let them print it. That doesn't mean they're perfect. They often misinterpret or misunderstand stories, sometimes maliciously, sometimes not. But it does mean that the stuff they print has been attribute to someone in the real world with a reputations at risk when they get things wrong.

Where as, no matter how many outright lies are included, your Youtube videos are only judged after the fact in the comment sections.

Also it's cute of you to ignore the substance of my comment, which is that these deaths from vaccinations are only from sick elderly people who couldn't handle the side effects. If you don't care about the corona deaths, why do you care about these?

^^^ Point bolded for emphasis since you have trouble following.

fraze 01-16-2021 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 798409)
Presumptive positive COVID-19 test results should be coded as confirmed. A presumptive positive test result means an individual has tested positive for the virus at a local or state level, but it has not yet been confirmed by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). CDC confirmation of local and state tests for COVID-19 is no longer required."

You bolded the wrong part moron. They're saying they don't need a second test from the CDC to consider a death confirmed. Which kind of makes sense given the demand for testing.

So all of the people with this code have tested positive for COVID before they died with symptoms attributable to COVID-19. Why do you need a 2nd CDC test to validate this? How is this evidence of a conspiracy? Why are you so obtuse?

Coop 01-16-2021 06:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798417)
I never said it incorrect, I just said it was a bad source of news.

This is what we call the "strawman fallacy". You accusing me of doing some bad thing that you've invented (assuming your source is incorrect and not reading it) just so you can take me down for it. It's a favorite rhetorical technique of our current President.


I'm telling you to quote reputable sources because otherwise its just an article on some website. Just because someone understands Wordpress doesn't make them a subject matter expert. Do better.

I read your article, noticed the lack of basic information that would be included in any news story, then I went to find out what was actually happening.

When you finish playing board games, maybe you'll realize I posted the same thing from a reputable source to show that the "mainstream" media is reporting on this because its a legitimate story.

Don't find it strange that new world order is allowing this story on vaccination deaths? Isn't that against the pro-vaccine narrative the powers at be are trying to push in your conspiracy fantasy? Why report on this anti-vaccine story but not the BS you're pulling out of Youtube videos.

It's because real journalists have to verify a story from multiple sources before their editors let them print it. That doesn't mean they're perfect. They often misinterpret or misunderstand stories, sometimes maliciously, sometimes not. But it does mean that the stuff they print has been attribute to someone in the real world with a reputations at risk when they get things wrong.

Where as, no matter how many outright lies are included, your Youtube videos are only judged after the fact in the comment sections.

Also it's cute of you to ignore the substance of my comment, which is that these deaths from vaccinations are only from sick elderly people who couldn't handle the side effects. If you don't care about the corona deaths, why do you care about these?

^^^ Point bolded for emphasis since you have trouble following.

You said all of that to just agree with me...., the same shit was said regardless of source. Smh.

You’re also asking me to assume the mindset of something/one I’ve never made claim to. What you’re doing is called “stereotyping”.

You first immediately classify anyone discussing what I’m discussing as a conspiracy theorist.

Then, because your definition of it is heavily influenced by MSM, you automatically assume every theorist believes the same thing. Or that they believe everything they see.

To put it plainly, you assume they don’t have discernment. Which is mighty arrogant and congruent with someone who makes it a point to mention they “went to engineering school” or w/e you said.

That’s your issue.

Fake smart.

As far as the bold, we need to clarify here. Mr. Straw man. In what context did I say “I don’t care about the corona deaths” . Smells like something you just made up

Coop 01-16-2021 06:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798418)
You bolded the wrong part moron. They're saying they don't need a second test from the CDC to consider a death confirmed. Which kind of makes sense given the demand for testing.

So all of the people with this code have tested positive for COVID before they died with symptoms attributable to COVID-19. Why do you need a 2nd CDC test to validate this? How is this evidence of a conspiracy? Why are you so obtuse?

Please make note of the sentence I posted under this very paragraph.

Clearly by your reaction, you did not comprehend and completely missed my point. I invite you to reread from the beginning, slowly.

fraze 01-16-2021 06:26 PM

I'm done with you bruh. You have repeatedly undercounted the deaths and diminished the impact of the virus as only affecting the sick and elderly. I stated the comparison more clearly in my original post. But you're clearly dodging because you don't have an answer.

Do you. I'm out.

Coop 01-16-2021 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798421)
I'm done with you bruh. You have repeatedly undercounted the deaths and diminished the impact of the virus as only affecting the sick and elderly. I stated the comparison more clearly in my original post. But you're clearly dodging because you don't have an answer.

Do you. I'm out.

What about my making hundreds of posts about the matter, my thorough and long winded responses, and endless debating with 99% of the ppl in here, give you the impression that I’m dodging anything?

I welcome any and all opinion. I just ask you have the intellectual capacity to observe different perspectives objectively, and you have the ability to communicate your stance efficiently.

Coop 01-17-2021 11:01 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_hwJkhNo9w

Yet another doctor coming out and explaining the deceptive practices going on. 30 minutes. Brings out Supreme Court rulings, explains why these “vaccines” aren’t really vaccines, but gene therapy agents, and explains why that’s important as it relates to liability protection, and more.

These are the videos that people click on, see that it’s 30 minutes, and don’t watch.

And that’s the reason why you are still able to be duped, manipulated and controlled. They are relying on your short attention span distracting you from doing any research or listening to the professionals exposing shit

Coop 01-17-2021 11:03 AM

Also, did you know that every adverse reaction event from the Pfizer/moderna vax (defined by the cdc as “unable to work, or perform daily activities) are in the thousands, and are all reported to VAERS? Which means you can go right now and look up all the reported problems with any vaccine. There are hundreds of thousands

https://vaers.hhs.gov/

Objective 01-18-2021 08:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pakistani Hand Cannon (Post 798328)
Fear is the real virus that humanity is afflicted by.

Investigate the feelings in your body - seeking to escape it, perpetuates it - you run from it, & it runs you.

Blessing for the new year, be healthy in mind and body my G.

Didn't see this till now but you're 100% right. If onky logic and emotions went well together it would be a completely different battle. But accepting it is the first step and defo on that road now. What holds me back a lil is regular life stuff everyone goes through that hinders progress on the other stuff but at least it's 1 step forward and 1 back, then 2 steps forward and 1 back.

Definitely helps that everything else is getting better too as confidence and sense of self is normalizing and getting better every month. No more escaping with weed and other self destructive tendencies :)

Ouch 01-18-2021 09:04 PM

I didnt get the vaccine I just thought about it...


I got krumping as fuck

Coop 01-22-2021 09:44 AM

WELL WELL WELL!!!!!!!!!!

WHAT DO WE HAVE HERE ?!!?!?!?!?!?!

TURNS OUT I WAS RIGHT ( DUH)

Is this the WHO CONFIRMING what I, and millions of others, have discovered about this plandem- I mean, pandemic?

What a coincidence that HOURS after Biden is inaugurated, the WHO comes out with THIS:

https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-...-users-2020-05

TLDR?

The PCR test is unreliable as hell, gives out more false positives than you’d like to believe, leading to inflated numbers, never ending fear mongering, and false justification of mandatory “health measures”.

I’ve been telling y’all for MONTHS this was the case.

And NOW they wanna come out and say, you know, maybe this thing isn’t working right.

LMAOO

They don’t expect the general public to catch little things like this.

Nah bruh, WE SEE IT. That’s why we’re exposing it. We saw that change to the definition of herd immunity too.

Y’all starting to see the playbook? Come on you Monday morning QBs

1) Virus happens
2) PCR test determined to be flawed, but public doesn’t really know.
3) Use inflated numbers to stoke fear, blame deaths on current admin, slowly remove freedoms under guise of “safety”
4) This and other group thought strategy deployed through MSM works, Biden wins, freedoms taken
5) change PCR testing to be more accurate after victory. Convince public the numbers went down due to Biden/vaccine, freedoms still taken because why not

Do you REALLY think it’s IMPLAUSIBLE that a pandemic could be used for personal gain or political purpose. The timing of this doesn't strike you as odd?

Pay.
Attention.

Ouch 01-22-2021 10:22 PM

the fuck... turn this nigga off and delete his shit

Coop 01-23-2021 06:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ouch (Post 798889)
the fuck... turn this nigga off and delete his shit

Who tf are you gtfo

uh-oh 01-23-2021 09:20 AM

coop dawg. they're blind bro. just look at the hank aaron thing. he gets the covid vaccine and strokes out. they say, well he is 86 any 86 year old can have a stroke and die the vaccine meant nothing. i would even be inclined to believe that. but those same people, would say covid killed him if he tested positive two days before this stroke. it wouldn't be the stroke of an 86 year old man. its not natural causes. its a pandemic you fool!

basically moral of the story those who think you're a nutcase ain't gonna change. the evidence and facts don't matter unless its spewed by one of the drones from the side of the aisle they align with

Eŋg 01-23-2021 12:08 PM

you motherfuckers stupid

@fraze to tell us how the PCR test is basically perfect and the SAGE models that drove 98% of the policy on this thing were clearly flawless because - and get this - he actually watches the news.

my nigga.

Answer 01-23-2021 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by coop
https://www.who.int/news/item/20-01-...-users-2020-05

TLDR?

The PCR test is unreliable as hell, gives out more false positives than you’d like to believe, leading to inflated numbers, never ending fear mongering, and false justification of mandatory “health measures”.

The number of False positives overrepresent a population where the virus doesn’t exist. They’re more accurate when there are more people who are actually infected. The extreme examples of this concept are if 0% of the human population had the virus, then 100% of the false positive tests would be inaccurate. If 100% of the population has the virus, then clearly false positives don’t exist. It’s not that hard of a concept to understand, and it’s not new information. I learned about that shit freshman year of college before COVID even existed. This shit is statistics 101.

Anyone who is a legitimate scientist is aware of these facts and WHO has been stating these facts on their website publicly, because that’s what science is. A conspiracy implies a coverup of this information, this information has always been available and transparent.

This is only new information to people like coop because they’re uneducated.

In the meantime, over 60 million vaccines have already been administered worldwide. A disproportionate number of the people receiving those vaccines are people who are elderly or currently suffering from health issues. Again, people like coop are uneducated and have a hard time wrapping their brain around large numbers and don’t understand causality.

The fact is that there are valid arguments for being skeptical of the vaccine, but those arguments are getting weaker by the day and coop is too busy connecting newspaper clippings with strings of yarn in his moms basement to form a rational discussion.

fraze 01-23-2021 08:14 PM

So I'm pretty much over this. Let's check in on COVID in 6 months and see who was right. Either the vaccine will have helped get this under control, or we'll all be krump zombies.

Strikta 01-24-2021 12:01 AM

Dat rona vira

Coop 02-03-2021 09:32 PM

Yet another medical professional got a very similar condition to the lady in the OP shortly after the vaccine

https://www.facebook.com/10001037259...303835358691/?

The Dead Poet 02-03-2021 10:44 PM

Haven't read thread. Don't really give a shit. But I'd like to add that I got the vaccine. My dick still works...so all is well here thus far.

fraze 02-03-2021 10:53 PM

Date...............Covid deaths.....Krumping kases
01-13-2021.....382,120............1....................
02-03-2021.....450,567............2....................


I think you convinced me. This is getting pretty serious. Something has to be done.

Answer 02-03-2021 11:16 PM

Vaccine doses administered globally: 108,115,680

At least 54 million people and coop has yet to provide evidence that supports his premise. Will also likely continue to be uninformed and refuse to concede that he was wrong

Coop 02-03-2021 11:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 799727)
Date...............Covid deaths.....Krumping kases
01-13-2021.....382,120............1....................
02-03-2021.....450,567............2....................


I think you convinced me. This is getting pretty serious. Something has to be done.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 799699)
I'm a little bored with COVID debates so I'll leave it at that without taking a position.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798930)
So I'm pretty much over this. Let's check in on COVID in 6 months and see who was right. Either the vaccine will have helped get this under control, or we'll all be krump zombies.


Still can’t help yourself I see.

#RentFree

Answer 02-03-2021 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 799729)
Still can’t help yourself I see.

#RentFree

Why aren’t 54 million people krumping coop?

Coop 02-03-2021 11:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Answer (Post 799730)
Why aren’t 54 million people krumping coop?

Are you asking me why everyone who took the vaccine isnt experiencing the exact same side effect?



Thought you were smarter than that to ask such a stupid question

Answer 02-03-2021 11:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 799731)
Are you asking me why everyone who took the vaccine isnt experiencing the exact same side effect?



Thought you were smarter than that to ask such a stupid question

It’s a rhetorical question. Look the word up in a dictionary

You were wrong. Part of intelligence isn’t about always being right, but having the ability to understand and admit to yourself when you’re wrong and adapt your understanding of the world to improve in the future. That’s the lesson you should take away from this. Take a break from the YouTube conspiracy videos and go get laid

Coop 02-03-2021 11:25 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Answer (Post 799733)
It’s a rhetorical question. Look the word up in a dictionary

You were wrong. Part of intelligence isn’t about always being right, but having the ability to understand and admit to yourself when you’re wrong and adapt your understanding of the world to improve in the future. That’s the lesson you should take away from this. Take a break from the YouTube conspiracy videos and go get laid

Look up the purpose of rhetorical questions. Your question doesn’t have any logical basis in which it makes sense to ask, seeing as how my stance never was “everyone who takes the vaccine will krump” or anything close.

I thought you were one of the smart ones smh


You can prove this to yourself by simply asking yourself what was I wrong about?

Answer 02-03-2021 11:26 PM

Take a break from the YouTube conspiracy videos and go get laid

Coop 02-03-2021 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Answer (Post 799735)
Take a break from the YouTube conspiracy videos and go get laid

Great deflection. I’ll take that as a “you’re right coop, so I have to diss you instead of providing an intellectual response.”

Par for the course


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:01 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.