Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   the Kajieme Powell shooting video (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=90137)

big baby 08-22-2014 07:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oats (Post 386841)
and over militarized culture.

yeah those guys had so much riot gear when they shot that dude right before they rolledup in their tank nigg STFU LOST

millz 08-22-2014 09:20 AM

I just can't believe that we are even considering the idea of shooting someone in the foot or leg or firing warning shots. That to me is laughable. It is so far from the scope of reality. Maybe you guys believe we should arm police with smiles and rainbow dust

They responded to a call for a armed suspect. Tasers are not for armed suspects, but let's entertain that idea for a second. So they pull up and see an aggressive armed suspect and draw their guns (appropriate). Now let's say one of the officers decides to holster his weapon and pull his taser out. You do realize it is scientifically proven that in the time it takes him to draw his weapon and rapidly fire 2 shots center mass the man with the knife can cover 21ft if he chooses to rush the cop. Now your expecting him to make that decision in that short time and holster a weapon on top of it when the guy is significantly closer than what is legally and scientifically determined as lethal range. You are literally asking this man to unnecessarily risk his life to a point further than it already is on a daily basis. And not only are you asking him to do this you are asking him to do this in an encounter that took less than 15seconds. This wasn't something that was talked and talked and talked and then escalated. This was at 100mph the second they got out of the vehicle.

Paradox 08-22-2014 09:53 AM

The guy was walking towards him at 5kmph, pretty sure you can shoot a guy walking towards you at a toddlers pace with a tazer, miss, pepper spray him, miss, do a jig and handstand, miss then fire your gun.

Diode 08-22-2014 09:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by millz (Post 386911)
I just can't believe that we are even considering the idea of shooting someone in the foot or leg or firing warning shots. That to me is laughable. It is so far from the scope of reality. Maybe you guys believe we should arm police with smiles and rainbow dust

They responded to a call for a armed suspect. Tasers are not for armed suspects, but let's entertain that idea for a second. So they pull up and see an aggressive armed suspect and draw their guns (appropriate). Now let's say one of the officers decides to holster his weapon and pull his taser out. You do realize it is scientifically proven that in the time it takes him to draw his weapon and rapidly fire 2 shots center mass the man with the knife can cover 21ft if he chooses to rush the cop. Now your expecting him to make that decision in that short time and holster a weapon on top of it when the guy is significantly closer than what is legally and scientifically determined as lethal range. You are literally asking this man to unnecessarily risk his life to a point further than it already is on a daily basis. And not only are you asking him to do this you are asking him to do this in an encounter that took less than 15seconds. This wasn't something that was talked and talked and talked and then escalated. This was at 100mph the second they got out of the vehicle.

i am very much not in the mood to agree with millz right now, but srs, guys.

they followed the rules.

millz 08-22-2014 10:05 AM

Diode secretly loves me. It's ok. I love you to. No romo

Greed 08-22-2014 10:14 AM

Worldstar got a video of a dude getting shot by police in san Diego over not paying a bus fare. Shot him in the back.

This is an issue.

This is not. This particular instance is not.

No time to switch back to taser. He was moving erratically. Shooting his pinky toe would have been a waste of a bullet. One, maybe two steps closer the police would of had to turn and run.

He fucked up. Leave these specific police alone and focus that argument on better training overall.

Edit: millz covered the taser switch but I wasnt bout to read all that. But then I did. So...

uh-oh 08-22-2014 11:33 AM

i like how you guys say police are "trained" to deal with these situations, so they shouldve found a non lethal way to subdue the guy

not realizing that this was by the book how they are trained to stop this type of guy

Blanco Bishop 08-22-2014 12:31 PM

As much as i want to make a case for the dude shot, he fucked up.

They pulled guns out on him. Any reasonable person would have stopped dead in their tracks n cooperated.

He definately wanted to get s.hot

Objective 08-23-2014 06:38 AM

Why they didn't have the tazer ready when they got out of the car is beyond any reasonable logic. There's 2 cops there, 2! 1 to have the tazer ready, 1 to shoot the fucker. Should have ran out and tazered the fucker right off the fucking bat if the only other option is to shoot the guy if he don't calm down. If he charged the other dude could have shot. I mean, what the fuck man. This is some out of routine trigger happy bullshit along with possibly traumatizing several bystanders by what they just witnessed. Great work!

By the book or not I think this could have been handled a lot better.

Sharp 08-23-2014 10:24 AM

I kind of agree with you objective, it would be nice to see everyone walk away from the incident alive, but these guys would have to put themselves in a very risky spot to do that. He had a potentially deadly weapon on him and was getting exceedingly close to them. If one tried to tase him that would put him in a very risky situation

oats 08-23-2014 10:51 AM

edit: drunk, sorry

dead man 08-23-2014 05:09 PM

shocking there isn't an officer of the law registered here who can offer a more experienced perspective on the matter.

but yeah idk. guy provoked the police and they reacted the same way (i believe) he thought they would. whether they were "right" or "wrong" is a very fine line. apparently @Diode knows everything about law enforcement protocol so according to him (and a few others) they were well within their rights to take this man's life.

whats more problematic is the humanitarian issues at hand. we all know that legality and ethics are far removed from one another.

does anybody watch the news regularly? is this being covered?

Diode 08-23-2014 05:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dead man (Post 387908)
shocking there isn't an officer of the law registered here who can offer a more experienced perspective on the matter.

but yeah idk. guy provoked the police and they reacted the same way (i believe) he thought they would. whether they were "right" or "wrong" is a very fine line. apparently @Diode knows everything about law enforcement protocol so according to him (and a few others) they were well within their rights to take this man's life.

whats more problematic is the humanitarian issues at hand. we all know that legality and ethics are far removed from one another.

does anybody watch the news regularly? is this being covered?

no, the place diode trains at is owned by the top federal marshal in SC and is a former secret service agent. we also have a county cop and a local cop at the gym. we've been discussing this a lot lately.

my uncle is also a recently retired county sheriff up north.

you shoot at center mass, if that fails, you shoot the head. you can't shoot to wound - that's a lawsuit first and foremost (maiming) and secondly may not stop the threat.

this guy broke the 21ft rule, period. someone is coming at you with a knife. do you trust that they will be completely rendered motionless if your taser hits? what if it misses? can you go from taser->gun and fire enough shots and hit to stop him in time?

watch the mythbusters on closing distance with a knife vs. a handgun. might open your eyes a bit on your expectation.

StarFaggot 08-23-2014 07:57 PM

Somebody charge me with a knife at that slow speed he was I prolly shoot him in the stomach. This man unloaded 6 shots idc how fast your gun unloads. These cops were pussy. It's broad daylight.

oats 08-23-2014 09:27 PM

all of the people saying it was fine to shoot this dude are operating on the false premise that he "charged them with a knife." Unless there is some other video footage out there, that's just not true.

uh-oh 08-23-2014 10:24 PM

you use "charge" i use "approached"

this video footage clearly shows him do, just that

the video also shows the cops using RESTRAINT.

he takes a step back as the police exit the vehicle yelling "TAKE YOUR HAND OUT OF YOUR POCKET" he takes his hand out while walking TOWARDS the officers, the officers yell repeatedly "DROP THE KNIFE" while he is yelling "SHOOT ME", he stops moving forward/towards them and walks parrallel to them, over that little wall, into that yard. he then begins ADVANCING on the police again.

just watch the video man he is clearly approaching/advancing/whatever you want to call it, and he falls on the sidewalk

watch the video quit being a hippy

El Muffin 08-24-2014 11:20 AM

the fuck is he doing

Zen 08-24-2014 11:30 AM

I think what people are missing, and is what oats is saying, is that the protocol is what's wrong. Regardless of what you feel about this incident, we do have an over militarized police force. Their protocol is to shoot to KILL. What should the policy be changed to? Idk, but when this many people are shot to death by cops it needs to change. It doesn't make anyone feel safer, not even the cops.

Witty 08-24-2014 11:31 AM

There's gonna be a revolution.

Dunno when, dunno how...but it's coming.

And I fear it will be violent.

Badweather 08-24-2014 11:32 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aero (Post 386441)
To shoot him that many times is excessive then to handcuff a corpse is ridiculous.

I did swat team training while in the military. We're taught to handcuff even seemingly non threats because you don't truly know if they're not a threat. Even innocent hostages get cuffed, it's to prevent loss of life.

StarFaggot 08-24-2014 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Seadad (Post 388411)
I did swat team training while in the military. We're taught to handcuff even seemingly non threats because you don't truly know if they're not a threat. Even innocent hostages get cuffed, it's to prevent loss of life.

There's a thing called common sense.

Witty 08-24-2014 11:37 AM

Yeah if someone is not breathing they probably wont hurt you.

Unless they are zombies.
@Zombie

Badweather 08-24-2014 11:57 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aero (Post 388420)
There's a thing called common sense.

Well, the dude I quoted obviously didn't understand that

millz 08-24-2014 01:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zen (Post 388402)
I think what people are missing, and is what oats is saying, is that the protocol is what's wrong. Regardless of what you feel about this incident, we do have an over militarized police force. Their protocol is to shoot to KILL. What should the policy be changed to? Idk, but when this many people are shot to death by cops it needs to change. It doesn't make anyone feel safer, not even the cops.



You realize that statistically speaking next to zero percent of arrests end in someone being shot to death. With approx 12 million arrests around 400 result in someone of any color being shot to death. That's like 0.00003%

Witty 08-24-2014 01:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by millz (Post 388522)
You realize that statistically speaking next to zero percent of arrests end in someone being shot to death. With approx 12 million arrests around 400 result in someone of any color being shot to death. That's like 0.00003%

Compare it with other first world countries and you will see the problem.

millz 08-24-2014 01:30 PM

I'm not saying it isn't a problem, I'm saying it's not anywhere near as big of problem as people and the media are making it out to be. It's no different than the idea of background checks and "assault rifle" bans and mass shootings. Americas priorities are fucked up.

Less than a quarter of a percent of gun deaths are from mass shooting yet we spend 99% of our effort and time talking about that as opposed to trying to make changes to something where efforts actually effect change.

We are focusing 99% of our time and effort talking about white police shooting black males, and completing forgetting to talk about things that actually have huge effects on that same community. Like the fact that they are more likely to be imprisioned for non violent drug crimes. How your more likely to end up on death row. How our monetary system forces them to remain in poverty or how our drug laws have a major hand played in the fact that over 90% of black males are murdered by other black males.

We don't talk about those things because people don't give two shits about real change. They just want this facade of holding hands and being down for the cause to keep their position of power in whatever capacity that is.

The house is on fire and we are worried about changing the batteries in the remote control.

Diode 08-24-2014 02:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Zen (Post 388402)
. Their protocol is to shoot to KILL.

wrong.

protocol is to stop the threat.

Zen 08-24-2014 03:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diode (Post 388579)
wrong.

protocol is to stop the threat.

You don't say?

But since wounding them won't stop the threat according to 95% of the people itt, I guess the protocol is to shoot to fucking kill. Why are you disagreeing with me when there's nothing to disagree over?

Ghost1 08-24-2014 03:14 PM

Id say his point against urs is that not every threat calls for deadly force in order to nuetralize a threat nor is deadly force applied against every threat....this is a rarity.

Witty 08-24-2014 03:15 PM

Like bags touching a vagina.

hahahahahahaha

because ur hideous, get it???

jk <3

PancakeBrah 08-24-2014 03:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Witty (Post 388408)
There's gonna be a revolution.

Dunno when, dunno how...but it's coming.

And I fear it will be violent.

I hate the killers but I don't believe in the activists.

Witty 08-24-2014 03:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by El Pancake (Post 388602)
I hate the killers but I don't believe in the activists.

Precisely.

That's why I fear it will be violent.

Ghost1 08-24-2014 03:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Witty (Post 388600)
Like bags touching a vagina.

hahahahahahaha

because ur hideous, get it???

jk <3

OH YEA LULZOID. ....THATS AN ATEROID PROPELLED BY LULZ ...I AM ON THE ASTEROID LULZING TO THE MOON CUZ OF THA5 POST

WOW REALLY STRONG ZTUFF

EXCEPT MINUS ALL OF THAT AND ACTUALLY REPLACE IT WITH FAGGOTHEADEDNESS

U HQVE THAT

CUZ GAY

Witty 08-24-2014 03:27 PM

Too mean.

Diode 08-24-2014 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Bags (Post 388599)
Id say his point against urs is that not every threat calls for deadly force in order to nuetralize a threat nor is deadly force applied against every threat....this is a rarity.


uh-oh 08-24-2014 04:13 PM

i wish i was a cop so i could call to borrow one of your guys kitchen knives and when you came over to give it to me i would shoot you in the dick

HOW BOUT THAT

Witty 08-24-2014 04:14 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 388640)
i wish i was a cop so i could call to borrow one of your guys kitchen knives and when you came over to give it to me i would shoot you in the dick

HOW BOUT THAT

If it's bags your aim is gonna have to be good.

Not a very big target...according to his sister at least.

jk bags.

uh-oh 08-24-2014 04:18 PM

CUZ BAGS HAS A LITTLE DICK

GOT EM

HEY BAGS HOWS YOUR BEARD GROWING? OH I FORGOT YOU CUT IT AND ARE A WOMAN WITH A CLITDICK

Witty 08-24-2014 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 388648)
CUZ BAGS HAS A LITTLE DICK

GOT EM

Pretty sure nobody has ever used that as an insult against someone else before, ever...I like to be original.

Badweather 08-25-2014 04:38 PM

back when i was an armed watchstander for the nuclear submarine i was on. we were definitely taught to aim at center mass, with 3 bullets.

maybe both officers shot 3 times?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:37 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.