![]() |
Quote:
|
Fixed Gow between autocorrect n phone lagging cuz of update it kinda fucked me
n that was a canned response @ knuck if I ever seen one |
Bags provided me with the context I was looking for.
officially voting bags in the weak competition argument is weak in itself imo --- weak competition may have contributed to his quantity, but the quantity does not take away from the quality. he had wins against some top battlers, nika/karpis/hush/beyond. showed strong diversity on the topical front - pulling off a W vs. Vulgar, who I consider to be a very polished and consistent writer. good diversity across the board. Would love the beefer vs. leader ratio to change a bit - because I think he could be a great influence on the board if he chose. But that's neither here nor there lol. Keep up the great work, Bags. peace. |
Handjobs activated!
|
Quote:
Bags should be in just sayin |
Quote:
|
|
U guys made an even numbered panel....again
-__________- |
Roflzzz
|
Next up Mets.
Champed on Netcees, nothing. Winning percentage in the .800's Can beat anyone. I'll start the voting off with a no. |
Lmao.
I vote u into the friendship hof, joe mets |
If i tried i could make the HOF.
Too lazy to join all that shit tho. Didnt even wanna join the classic lol |
Thanks tho Bags.
BOARDSMEN DOHPE REPPIN |
..... whoo
|
Goin by how many different things you champed shouldn't really be the overriding criteria.
General level of writing ability should... That said, I'd vote yes for Baggatory |
|
Now that bags and bey is in. The boxhead mets sized jersey wearer should be in, no?
|
Quote:
he has beat heads considered some of the best ie hensley |
I just leaned
|
No one with AIDS should be in. Sorry, Bags.
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.