Netcees - how mad are black people right now?

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)

- Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)

- - how mad are black people right now? (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=108237)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Batty (Post 443012)

Yeah, all the evidence is available now and all the evidence has been saying that he was shot 6 times. That's kinda my point, people are still going by a lot of the fake reports from day 1 of this thing.

Mike Brown's family said the right thing, what needs to change is all cops should have to wear cameras at all times. Ferguson police deserve to be held accountable because they actually have all of the cameras and gear but did not utilize them.

Stereotyping and racism exists within the police force and that should never be accepted or excused but if you look at what's going on in Ferguson right now, it perpetuates the stereotype. People feel justified in destroying shit and stealing shit simply because a court didn't rule in favor of the side they supported based on recanted statements and sensationalized media reports.

You have to ask yourself why would anybody want to make a common thug into a martyr anyways? Mike Brown robbed a store, beat the owner up and then once the video gets released, people loot the same store and burn it to the ground. Nobody gives even half a shit about the innocent store owner.

http://www.breitbart.com/Breitbart-T...on-National-TV

The problem is that people think they can glorify the thug lifestyle but get mad when police don't follow all the rules. You can't have both. People are looting and destroying shit simply because they want to, it's an opportunity for them. You can't tell me that anybody honestly thinks that peace can somehow be achieved and stereotypes can be changed by stealing malt liquor, weave and Jordans.

let's be real tho.

Please don't ever link to Breitbart when you are trying to make a salient point. Further, he was fired upon 12 times, 6 bullets hit.

Yes let us be real old friend:

Innocent until proven guilty.

this cop was acting in self defense. End of case

Quote:

Originally Posted by VERITAS (Post 443014)

Yes let us be real old friend:

Innocent until proven guilty.

this cop was acting in self defense. End of case

There was no opportunity to prove him guilty seeings how he wasn't indicted. There was no case.

I think the shot count was excessive. He was clearly shooting to kill. You shouldn't give weak men guns bc that's there go to defense.

No one is condoning rioting. It was an injustice that affected the neighborhood. I don't know all the details but a young kid was shot down. Why aren't we all mad about that.

He acted in self defense. Case closed.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aero the slut mouth. (Post 443019)

FYI - you are always shooting to kill. No police officer, infrantryman, marine, etc. is trained to "shoot to wound" - that's a fool's game and a common myth. Always center mass, and failing that, aim for the head (center mass is preferred because it is, obviously, a much larger/easier target).

Mike brown was a criminal thug. He attacked a police officer. The fact that the cop acted in self defense and the very people who say they want justice riot when justice is served show that they do not want justice.

this is an nwo moment right here. Congrats ferguson. You have sped up the militarized police element agenda.

yup, and shoot until there's no visible threat
which means a lot of times

Quote:

Originally Posted by Diode (Post 443022)

False.

Most cops only shoot to kill if there is imminent threat from a weapon. If he wasn't so weak he couldve pulled out a baton or at most the taser.

The simple fact that he didn't hit him kill shot first time only proves the point sir. Think about it.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aero the slut mouth. (Post 443025)

False.

Most cops only shoot to kill if there is imminent threat from a weapon. If he wasn't so weak he couldve pulled out a baton or at most the taser.

You are completely and totally wrong. You never draw your weapon, period, unless you plan to kill. This is basic firearms training for civilians let alone police officers and military.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Aero the slut mouth. (Post 443011)

It's weird seeing people who are much poorer than me try to be racist lol. I mean come on Bags we know your life isn't shit evidenced by the fat chick & the fact that your car doesn't have leather seats.

You're a sweating slob of mediocrity & your daughter doesn't have a role model.

White people riot over losing a hockey series.

U are a panfaced gook

provide proof to ur claims or i cant take u serious.

Innocent until proven guilty. We give this right to even the worst among us.

but a group of people want a man to not have that.....because why?

I will wait.

Quote:

Originally Posted by VERITAS (Post 443030)

Innocent until proven guilty. We give this right to even the worst among us.

but a group of people want a man to not have that.....because why?

I will wait.

Maybe you missed the part where I said he wasn't indicted which means there's no case which means no opportunity to prove anything.

And why was he not indicted?

you realize arero, that whether or not an indictment occurs depends on the preponderance of evidence and how much is actually available. meaning, if there is not enough evidence to convict somebody in a trial, then there's no indictment handed down. what would you prefer to have happen? Do you want them to indict someone without proper evidence just because people who are ignorant to that evidence are calling for it?

Thank you jude. Well said.

Now then: is there anything else we need to discuss here?

I have nothing to say bout it cause I don't know the whole truth but then again I know the justice system is bullshit when it comes to cops so I'm taking the 5th on the matter. I'm just tired of watching the news and focusing on this media bullshit cause it's a hopeless battle for something positive to come from it. Drama drama drama