Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Now is the time to worry for REAL (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=9252)

Fart 07-26-2013 04:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SiK (Post 104521)
There was a lot of talk about us switching over to the SCAR from the M16/M4's .....But that was about 2+ years ago and I haven't heard anything since.

a lot of marines are already using the mk16/17 variant of the scar

SiK 07-26-2013 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Artemus (Post 104522)
a lot of marines are already using the mk16/17 variant of the scar

Their lucky.

Chyeahhh!!! 07-26-2013 04:25 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Artemus (Post 104501)
i'm not, i don't know i've never used one but they are probaby pretty light i imagine because of the materials used to make them. i've used an ak before tho and those are SURPRISINGLY not heavy like at all. you can easily fire an ak with one hand on semi

Have the hungarian amd, prolly the lightest one I've ever owned. It's done fine by me. I really want an underfolder though, BADDDDD! Been looking at the Yugo but they don't come chromelined which is a no no for me. Corrosive ammo is plenty and cheap and I buy a shit ton when I can find it lol

Fart 07-26-2013 04:40 PM

wordd how easy is it to clean? lol i hate cleaning so i try not to use the surplus/corrosive ammo too much. 762s are still fairly cheap tho. i'm thinking a Saiga 12 for my next baby

Chyeahhh!!! 07-26-2013 04:46 PM

easy as pie. Breakdown is standard for the ak except the gas and rod mechanism. It's shorter than most but it doesn't make it any more difficult. I've made a few changes to it for better ease of user, went the heavy quad picatanny route but it gave it too much forward weight. Took that junk off lol. kept it stock with the exception of a Hogue grip, custom cheek riser/weld, and a magwell enhancer for smoother mag switch transitions. I didn't even bother to put a recoil reducer in there, used to be a fan of them but I think they wear out the recoil springs. The AK to me is like the 1911, fuck with it too much and you mess up a brilliant design lol

anime_boners 07-26-2013 05:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh!!! (Post 104449)
7.62 x 39 rounds is not ammunition for the current issued rifles for U.S Troops. 223/5.56

7.62 is a Russian round most notably found in the AK, again not standard issue

what do they need those for?

not to mention all the .45 rounds they bought up, again...not standard issue ammunition for service weapon.

presumably what they're going to arm the syrians with IMO

not to attack us with lol

Chyeahhh!!! 07-26-2013 05:54 PM

who said anything about attacking us? lol sounds like you're going off the deepend there bucko.

why are they using a contractor/middle man though instead of just doing it directly since they've already come out and publically stated that they were going to arm them? Doesn't make since. Saves money and time by just doing it directly, and air dropping it rather than hire a sub military contractor to do it, who doesn't even have an exports license (that should be the dead giveaway right there lol)


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:31 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.