![]() |
chyeahhh you understand nibiru all comes from zacharia sitchin or whatever his name is right?
its common knowledge amongst those who work to fully decode the sumerian language that it was a misinterpretation of the planet jupiter. further, if it is on some crazy orbit where it comes by every 25000 years, it would be impossible. it could not support life in deep space. the theory of sitchins that they suspend gold dust particles in the atmosphere to heat the planet is completely ridiculous, gold dust is way too dense/its mass would never allow it to stay in an atmosphere even if there is some crazy way to magically keep gold dust in the atmosphere of an entire planet, there is no scientific evidence that it would heat the planet it would actually be the opposite. we put gold foil on our satelites and other things we send in to space for a couple of reasons. 1. it stays COOL. the light bounces right off of it. none of it is absorbed. 2, it pushes against it. if i cover a baseball in gold and throw it in outer space, the light reflecting off of it would push it through space like a wind just do the science man none of it makes sense. there are rewards for finding the existence of nibiru. if ANYTHING was found in the sky we don't know about, the first person to find it would scream it from the rooftops we have tons of people scanning the skies, and even more doing it on there own at home by various means, be it google earth images of space, or telescopes and everything else it hasnt been found, it doesnt exist we do not have a companion star its all made up. please, do the science, look into these things from all perspectives. you are looking from the perspective of people who want it to be real. |
also, planets can not have that type of orbit. it is impossible. that is the orbit of COMETS. planets are much too dense and would be pulled off of a huge orbit like that by pretty much everything remotely near it
it would crash into other planets, stars and etc. comets don't have the same density, and can sustain orbits like those, before inevitably crashing into something that crosses its path do the science dummy like saul told carrie in homeland you are the smartest and dumbest fucking person i've ever known |
So is this whole thread about...
The belief that we are mining precious metals for the aliens Under the guize of currency n jewelry But Really we r just collecting it for them That craziness?!?!? |
not necessarilly. i can't spell necesarily.
but its about that planet. the one that all those crazy made up theorys are about. chyeaah is at the very least saying its coming, and is going to disrupt the natural order of how things on earth are going. he isn't saying there are aliens on it that want our gold tho. and he's claiming a date as soon as december 16th. even tho no one has seen this PLANET thats 14 days away. but we can see asteroids that are nowhere near planet size that won't be here for years, and some for decades and centuries |
Quote:
Me calling your post vauge wasn't dumb at all infact it was bang on the money. You always say "This will happen" in a really vauge not really saying much way. But you never actually state the why's and hows. You try to word your posts in such a way to come across as poignant poetic but just come across as a bit of an idiot. How about you produce some reasoning to your claims rather than simply saying "Some people will die" . I got news for you. I don't know how clued up you are to this fact. But "some people" are going to die on the 16th of december twenty thirrrrteeeen anyway regardless whether or not your chin comes into alignment with planet earth. |
The thing i find strange is how mass extinctions seem to happen on a consistent timeframe, there seems to be a pattern...that is weird.
But I agree with uh oh, if there was a planet orbiting a sister star or stars, i feel like we would have at least found the star at this point, I've seen suggestions it could be a brown star which are easily the most common, and known to exist at about the same size as Jupiter or slightly larger making them immensely difficult to see, but that feels like a reach to me, fact is there is no fact...we have been looking for this and continue to find nothing. |
he speaks....
Quote:
actually I have. I'm well versed in this subject, over 10 years of research and I can tell you that 75% of all star systems in our neighborhood are indeed binary, some even triple sun systems. I can also tell you that Sitchin was most certainly not the first to research this lol. That's laughable and uh oh you're usually on point so if that was pulled out of your ass then I apologize for you. We found it back in 83, it was publicized, and covered up. We talked about it in books, was in the paper, etc. WISE was decommissioned and shut off. I can tell you that most of the people involved with WISE also died under suspicious circumstances. We can't even tell you how many brown dwarfs are directly outside of our system because, we can't see them all that well to be honest, only in infared spectrum. The dishes we do have out there for infared are top secret and the findings aren't made public. Brown dwarf stars may be the most common but we can't see them with the naked until they're up close and personal |
he speaks....
Quote:
|
he speaks....
Quote:
|
uh oh you need to chill and go look at how binary systems work. they both revolve around a center point of mass.
|
Quote:
What Earth changes? Why will the Earth change as a result of a celestial mass? By what method does the mass affect the Earth? This isn't a theory... its a set of irrational beliefs |
rawn. I've got my own theory on the annunaki thing. I think they were after the gold to harness the power of there sun directly. Look up something called a "dyson sphere"
|
he speaks....
Quote:
|
Quote:
i know that it is actually very uncommon for a singular star system. but uncommon doesnt mean it doesn't happen. if we had a companion star it could not be covered up because of the thousands of amateur astronomers and others watching and looking at the skies. i understand it could be hidden to the naked eye, but we would be able to "spot" it from looking at any other planetary object. our orbits are defined, there is no hidden companion star effecting our or any other orbit, its all mathematics our orbits are mathematically defined around the singular star, the sun. you can't dispute the math. please show me evidence of nibiru/planet x prior to sitchin im going to look up this 1983 stuff, because i am ignorant to it. |
Quote:
A brown star is actually a "failed star" or a mass that never managed to become big enough to undergo fusion and begin emitting light What makes planets, planets, is that they orbit a star. Otherwise they are asteroids or comets, depending on their composition. |
he speaks....
Quote:
|
he speaks....
Quote:
|
Quote:
A mass big enough (brown or binary star) to have this kind of influence on us would be a gas giant. I don't think planets bigger than Jupiter can physically have cores. I will look into it |
Quote:
Very interested in the archaeology/ glyphs that correspond to these extinctionary events though |
he speaks....
Quote:
|
Venus changed colors, Saturn got another ring and underwent the storm of the century. Mars got a tail, we've had more meteor sightings in the sky this year than the last few years combined, what else do yah fuckin want lol.
|
he speaks....
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
he speaks....
Quote:
|
he speaks....
Quote:
earthquakes, volcanoes, floods, weather, space debris, lions, tigers, and bears, take your pick. Not to say that people haven't died from these types of things before, surely no. I'm saying they all haven't died from them all at once in tandem around the world |
But I'm saying a pole shift is an internal process. Magnetic fields diminish with the square of radial distance. The magnetic field potential energy would have to be ABSURD to interact directly with our core.
It would rip apart the solar system. Or it would have to pass so close that it would collide with us/ send the Earth careening out of orbit. Set up rough, rough sample calculations and see for yourself the figures involved. |
Quote:
I mean take this for example. in 2013 we had the hottest summer since 1979. The 2013 summer was 1 degree cooler than the 79 summer which was .5 degrees cooler than the hottest summer recorded in 1945. Nature is unpredictable. It doesn't have to mean something is wrong, it doesn't have to be the direct result of something bad in the long term or the future it's just peaks and troughs. So we had more meteor sighting than ever. Is it impossible that this was just a natural inevitable the longer we exist? It was bound to happen sooner or later. Venus changed colors. Again how can you argue that this isn't a normal change we're just now happening to see as a human race? Infact just ignore the whole hottest summer thing it was stupid. but you get the point with the rest lol |
in 1841 astronomers were baffled by uranus not moving as predicted within its orbit. this had them searching for "planet x"
that to me is intriguing. and im guessing is what you are referencing when i said all this came from sitchin. what i meant was a rogue planet that interferes with the happenings on earth. there is no earlier evidence prior to sitchin of anything like that. other than the planet that actually hit us, creating the moon. also it takes uranus 84 years to orbit the sun. uranus was discovered in 1781 1781+84=1865 uranus hadn't even completed a complete orbit of the sun when this anomaly was discovered in 1841. you know what they found in 1846? neptune. not nibiru. then in 1930 they discovered pluto. still no nibiru. all their calculations didnt take neptune into factor with uranus' orbit. neptune is what affected its orbit. not nibiru/planet x. let me look into 1983 now tho and see what that is all about. |
what this needs is to be modeled on paper.
|
split the nibiru theory is it passes close enough to wreak havoc on everything. the oceans would roll over the continents and all types of shit. just like the moon pulls the tides, it would do that kind of shit, something of its size could throw us out of orbit and us being pulled back in could easily shift the poles
in theory of course but anything coming close to earth of any noticeable size is being tracked as we speak the things we need to worry about are the much smaller objects, like asteroids and meteors |
chyeahh this 1983 shit is utterly disappointing. i'm trying to find a normal site talking about it but i can only find the crazies
http://www.libertyforlife.com/nibiru...ru_in_1983.htm it starts out with the whole uranus thing of 1841 and the search for planet x. they found planet x in 1846. its name is neptune. but lets just disregard that little fact to see what they have to say. in 1983 they found objects with infrared and had no idea what it was. they said "I believe it's one of these dark, young galaxies that we have never been able to observe before" cool that sounds interesting then it goes on to say nasa discovered a planet X, and posted it in newspapers, and then in 1984 said they didnt find anything. this is intriguing. i want to look into what they found. then in the next sentence "In 1984, the first Chemtrail tests were carried out." WTF DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING LMAO all i can do is sigh. i'll look back into it later, look for the actual newspaper articles and what nasa said, and what made them wrong/redact the statements. and i'll search a little deeper for it being talked about on sites that aren't full of tinfoil hat wearers |
How close would this thing have to be for us to notice it and then how long would it be until we died?
I would like a few weeks notice at least. |
he speaks....
Quote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyxXgj9mLUk then take a few of these and call me in the morning: http://rabbithole2.com/presentation/research.htm |
http://www.universetoday.com/105424/
free floating planet someone asked about, just googled it and found this one I hadn't seen before |
he speaks....
Quote:
|
I kept saying, WISE, I'm sorry, that was IRAS
|
http://yowusa.com/planetx/2008/planetx-2008-05b/1.shtml
now this site is run by a guy who's written books on the subject, in terms of relevance here it doesn't matter imo. Familiarize yourself with Harrington, the guy who Sitchin himself said was on the right track before he started writing his Earth Chronicles series. |
my friends....which all of you are. Fret not, for you shall beholdeth (no Hush) this great thing I've spoken of in all of it's glory. Taketh to the skies and let thine eyes pilot thy letter boxes.
basically saying lookup, look away from that tablet, the girls ass...okay that's cool, but there's more important shit to look at |
Quote:
|
what was the great change on the 16th, again?
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.