Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   the planet of the crossing..the frightener..hercolobus...the red devil planet...the red dragon..the comet planet...nibiru...the brown dwarf star....nemesis...tyche...IS HERE (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=36244)

uh-oh 12-02-2013 01:44 PM

chyeahhh you understand nibiru all comes from zacharia sitchin or whatever his name is right?

its common knowledge amongst those who work to fully decode the sumerian language that it was a misinterpretation of the planet jupiter.

further, if it is on some crazy orbit where it comes by every 25000 years, it would be impossible. it could not support life in deep space. the theory of sitchins that they suspend gold dust particles in the atmosphere to heat the planet is completely ridiculous, gold dust is way too dense/its mass would never allow it to stay in an atmosphere

even if there is some crazy way to magically keep gold dust in the atmosphere of an entire planet, there is no scientific evidence that it would heat the planet

it would actually be the opposite. we put gold foil on our satelites and other things we send in to space for a couple of reasons. 1. it stays COOL. the light bounces right off of it. none of it is absorbed. 2, it pushes against it. if i cover a baseball in gold and throw it in outer space, the light reflecting off of it would push it through space like a wind

just do the science man

none of it makes sense.

there are rewards for finding the existence of nibiru. if ANYTHING was found in the sky we don't know about, the first person to find it would scream it from the rooftops

we have tons of people scanning the skies, and even more doing it on there own at home by various means, be it google earth images of space, or telescopes and everything else

it hasnt been found, it doesnt exist

we do not have a companion star

its all made up.

please, do the science, look into these things from all perspectives. you are looking from the perspective of people who want it to be real.

uh-oh 12-02-2013 01:48 PM

also, planets can not have that type of orbit. it is impossible. that is the orbit of COMETS. planets are much too dense and would be pulled off of a huge orbit like that by pretty much everything remotely near it

it would crash into other planets, stars and etc.

comets don't have the same density, and can sustain orbits like those, before inevitably crashing into something that crosses its path

do the science dummy

like saul told carrie in homeland

you are the smartest and dumbest fucking person i've ever known

Rawn MD 12-02-2013 01:51 PM

So is this whole thread about...

The belief that we are mining precious metals for the aliens

Under the guize of currency n jewelry

But Really we r just collecting it for them

That craziness?!?!?

uh-oh 12-02-2013 01:59 PM

not necessarilly. i can't spell necesarily.

but its about that planet.

the one that all those crazy made up theorys are about. chyeaah is at the very least saying its coming, and is going to disrupt the natural order of how things on earth are going. he isn't saying there are aliens on it that want our gold tho.

and he's claiming a date as soon as december 16th.

even tho no one has seen this PLANET

thats 14 days away.

but we can see asteroids that are nowhere near planet size that won't be here for years, and some for decades and centuries

Just C 12-02-2013 02:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara (Post 219588)
how is that vague? lol all of us will not die, some will die, those that don't die will live to tell about it. You're bout as dumb as a box of dead dicks if you didn't understand what I said earlier.

It's vauge because you're not saying how. why will only SOME of us die. why not ALL?

Me calling your post vauge wasn't dumb at all infact it was bang on the money. You always say "This will happen" in a really vauge not really saying much way. But you never actually state the why's and hows. You try to word your posts in such a way to come across as poignant poetic but just come across as a bit of an idiot. How about you produce some reasoning to your claims rather than simply saying "Some people will die" . I got news for you. I don't know how clued up you are to this fact. But "some people" are going to die on the 16th of december twenty thirrrrteeeen anyway regardless whether or not your chin comes into alignment with planet earth.

Witty 12-02-2013 02:29 PM

The thing i find strange is how mass extinctions seem to happen on a consistent timeframe, there seems to be a pattern...that is weird.

But I agree with uh oh, if there was a planet orbiting a sister star or stars, i feel like we would have at least found the star at this point, I've seen suggestions it could be a brown star which are easily the most common, and known to exist at about the same size as Jupiter or slightly larger making them immensely difficult to see, but that feels like a reach to me, fact is there is no fact...we have been looking for this and continue to find nothing.

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 02:53 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 219608)
please, do the science, look into these things from all perspectives. you are looking from the perspective of people who want it to be real.


actually I have. I'm well versed in this subject, over 10 years of research and I can tell you that 75% of all star systems in our neighborhood are indeed binary, some even triple sun systems. I can also tell you that Sitchin was most certainly not the first to research this lol. That's laughable and uh oh you're usually on point so if that was pulled out of your ass then I apologize for you. We found it back in 83, it was publicized, and covered up. We talked about it in books, was in the paper, etc. WISE was decommissioned and shut off. I can tell you that most of the people involved with WISE also died under suspicious circumstances. We can't even tell you how many brown dwarfs are directly outside of our system because, we can't see them all that well to be honest, only in infared spectrum. The dishes we do have out there for infared are top secret and the findings aren't made public. Brown dwarf stars may be the most common but we can't see them with the naked until they're up close and personal

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 02:56 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C (Post 219617)
It's vauge because you're not saying how. why will only SOME of us die. why not ALL?

Me calling your post vauge wasn't dumb at all infact it was bang on the money. You always say "This will happen" in a really vauge not really saying much way. But you never actually state the why's and hows. You try to word your posts in such a way to come across as poignant poetic but just come across as a bit of an idiot. How about you produce some reasoning to your claims rather than simply saying "Some people will die" . I got news for you. I don't know how clued up you are to this fact. But "some people" are going to die on the 16th of december twenty thirrrrteeeen anyway regardless whether or not your chin comes into alignment with planet earth.

I don't know how some of us are going to die, not trying to be poetic about it. I know earth changes will continue to get worse and us dying being a direct cause of those changes. Me saying I know how some of us will die directly would be foolish.

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 02:59 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 219610)
also, planets can not have that type of orbit. it is impossible. that is the orbit of COMETS. planets are much too dense and would be pulled off of a huge orbit like that by pretty much everything remotely near it

it would crash into other planets, stars and etc.

comets don't have the same density, and can sustain orbits like those, before inevitably crashing into something that crosses its path

do the science dummy

like saul told carrie in homeland

you are the smartest and dumbest fucking person i've ever known

the brown dwarf is a mini solar system of it's own with it's own planets. We have actually found free floating planets recently. Few articles on it earlier last year. We're still learning, always.

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:01 PM

uh oh you need to chill and go look at how binary systems work. they both revolve around a center point of mass.

Split 12-02-2013 03:02 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara (Post 219659)
I don't know how some of us are going to die, not trying to be poetic about it. I know earth changes will continue to get worse and us dying being a direct cause of those changes. Me saying I know how some of us will die directly would be foolish.

How do you know people will die if you don't know how they will die?

What Earth changes? Why will the Earth change as a result of a celestial mass? By what method does the mass affect the Earth?


This isn't a theory... its a set of irrational beliefs

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:02 PM

rawn. I've got my own theory on the annunaki thing. I think they were after the gold to harness the power of there sun directly. Look up something called a "dyson sphere"

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:03 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Split Eight (Post 219662)
How do you know people will die if you don't know how they will die?

What Earth changes? Why will the Earth change as a result of a celestial mass? By what method does the mass affect the Earth?


This isn't a theory... its a set of irrational beliefs

magnetic influence

uh-oh 12-02-2013 03:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara (Post 219658)
actually I have. I'm well versed in this subject, over 10 years of research and I can tell you that 75% of all star systems in our neighborhood are indeed binary, some even triple sun systems. I can also tell you that Sitchin was most certainly not the first to research this lol. That's laughable and uh oh you're usually on point so if that was pulled out of your ass then I apologize for you. We found it back in 83, it was publicized, and covered up. We talked about it in books, was in the paper, etc. WISE was decommissioned and shut off. I can tell you that most of the people involved with WISE also died under suspicious circumstances. We can't even tell you how many brown dwarfs are directly outside of our system because, we can't see them all that well to be honest, only in infared spectrum. The dishes we do have out there for infared are top secret and the findings aren't made public. Brown dwarf stars may be the most common but we can't see them with the naked until they're up close and personal

word

i know that it is actually very uncommon for a singular star system. but uncommon doesnt mean it doesn't happen. if we had a companion star it could not be covered up because of the thousands of amateur astronomers and others watching and looking at the skies. i understand it could be hidden to the naked eye, but we would be able to "spot" it from looking at any other planetary object. our orbits are defined, there is no hidden companion star effecting our or any other orbit, its all mathematics

our orbits are mathematically defined around the singular star, the sun. you can't dispute the math.

please show me evidence of nibiru/planet x prior to sitchin

im going to look up this 1983 stuff, because i am ignorant to it.

Split 12-02-2013 03:04 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara (Post 219660)
the brown dwarf is a mini solar system of it's own with it's own planets. We have actually found free floating planets recently. Few articles on it earlier last year. We're still learning, always.

Link to free floating planets?

A brown star is actually a "failed star" or a mass that never managed to become big enough to undergo fusion and begin emitting light

What makes planets, planets, is that they orbit a star. Otherwise they are asteroids or comets, depending on their composition.

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:04 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Split Eight (Post 219662)
How do you know people will die if you don't know how they will die?

because the ancients said, do you not believe them? It's one thing not to believe me but if it happened to them and it's cyclical then I'm inclined to believe them, especially seeing what I'm seeing in the world and such. It's your choice though

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:07 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Split Eight (Post 219666)
Link to free floating planets?

google is your friend

A brown star is actually a "failed star" or a mass that never managed to become big enough to undergo fusion and begin emitting light

may have not had enough mass to ignite but it may have enough mass to influence other bodies it comes in contact with. Preterbations (sp) explains this, that's the basics for finding other planets, how we found other planets in our system

What makes planets, planets, is that they orbit a star. Otherwise they are asteroids or comets, depending on their composition.


Split 12-02-2013 03:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara (Post 219664)
magnetic influence

Okay are you suggesting a pole shift? Because that relies on the planetary core, I thought?


A mass big enough (brown or binary star) to have this kind of influence on us would be a gas giant. I don't think planets bigger than Jupiter can physically have cores. I will look into it

Split 12-02-2013 03:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara (Post 219667)
because the ancients said, do you not believe them? It's one thing not to believe me but if it happened to them and it's cyclical then I'm inclined to believe them, especially seeing what I'm seeing in the world and such. It's your choice though

I think there is correlation not causation

Very interested in the archaeology/ glyphs that correspond to these extinctionary events though

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:18 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 219665)
word

i know that it is actually very uncommon for a singular star system. but uncommon doesnt mean it doesn't happen. if we had a companion star it could not be covered up because of the thousands of amateur astronomers and others watching and looking at the skies. i understand it could be hidden to the naked eye, but we would be able to "spot" it from looking at any other planetary object. our orbits are defined, there is no hidden companion star effecting our or any other orbit, its all mathematics

ask yourself why pluto was demoted, we were looking for a 10th planet fucking with Jupiter and found pluto, but pluto didn't have enough mass. It's all mathematical like you said

our orbits are mathematically defined around the singular star, the sun. you can't dispute the math.

you're absolutely correct, we abide by the laws of our own system set forth by our sun. When another system with it's own set of laws comes in there is a compromise when factoring in interactions is it not? Just look at the Sun and how it interacted with Ison, it got more agitated as Ison drew closer, resulting in 2 X Flares being sent in it's direction on it's way to the sun. That's just one example, remember we're actually setting the record for the lowest activity ever during a solar maximum

please show me evidence of nibiru/planet x prior to sitchin

look it up, I've done all that stuff too much and am tired frankly.

im going to look up this 1983 stuff, because i am ignorant to it.


admitting ignorance is always healthy, but in your case you're not ignorant to it, just being made aware of it, nothing ignorant about that


Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:20 PM

Venus changed colors, Saturn got another ring and underwent the storm of the century. Mars got a tail, we've had more meteor sightings in the sky this year than the last few years combined, what else do yah fuckin want lol.

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:21 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Split Eight (Post 219671)
I think there is correlation not causation

Very interested in the archaeology/ glyphs that correspond to these extinctionary events though

rabbithole2.com

Just C 12-02-2013 03:22 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara (Post 219659)
I don't know how some of us are going to die, not trying to be poetic about it. I know earth changes will continue to get worse and us dying being a direct cause of those changes. Me saying I know how some of us will die directly would be foolish.

I wasn't asking for facts my man I was asking for your theory's on what you THINK will cause people to die not just tell me people will die. thats all.

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:23 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Split Eight (Post 219670)
Okay are you suggesting a pole shift? Because that relies on the planetary core, I thought?


A mass big enough (brown or binary star) to have this kind of influence on us would be a gas giant. I don't think planets bigger than Jupiter can physically have cores. I will look into it

sure, why not a pole shift. We've had them before...yes?

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 03:25 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Just C (Post 219681)
I wasn't asking for facts my man I was asking for your theory's on what you THINK will cause people to die not just tell me people will die. thats all.


earthquakes, volcanoes, floods, weather, space debris, lions, tigers, and bears, take your pick. Not to say that people haven't died from these types of things before, surely no. I'm saying they all haven't died from them all at once in tandem around the world

Split 12-02-2013 03:29 PM

But I'm saying a pole shift is an internal process. Magnetic fields diminish with the square of radial distance. The magnetic field potential energy would have to be ABSURD to interact directly with our core.

It would rip apart the solar system. Or it would have to pass so close that it would collide with us/ send the Earth careening out of orbit.

Set up rough, rough sample calculations and see for yourself the figures involved.

Just C 12-02-2013 03:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara (Post 219679)
Venus changed colors, Saturn got another ring and underwent the storm of the century. Mars got a tail, we've had more meteor sightings in the sky this year than the last few years combined, what else do yah fuckin want lol.

I'm not going to act like a know it all on this subject because I'm not. But what makes you think that these are anything OTHER than natural occurances?

I mean take this for example. in 2013 we had the hottest summer since 1979.

The 2013 summer was 1 degree cooler than the 79 summer which was .5 degrees cooler than the hottest summer recorded in 1945.

Nature is unpredictable. It doesn't have to mean something is wrong, it doesn't have to be the direct result of something bad in the long term or the future it's just peaks and troughs.

So we had more meteor sighting than ever. Is it impossible that this was just a natural inevitable the longer we exist?

It was bound to happen sooner or later.

Venus changed colors. Again how can you argue that this isn't a normal change we're just now happening to see as a human race?

Infact just ignore the whole hottest summer thing it was stupid. but you get the point with the rest lol

uh-oh 12-02-2013 03:30 PM

in 1841 astronomers were baffled by uranus not moving as predicted within its orbit. this had them searching for "planet x"

that to me is intriguing. and im guessing is what you are referencing when i said all this came from sitchin. what i meant was a rogue planet that interferes with the happenings on earth. there is no earlier evidence prior to sitchin of anything like that. other than the planet that actually hit us, creating the moon.

also

it takes uranus 84 years to orbit the sun.

uranus was discovered in 1781

1781+84=1865

uranus hadn't even completed a complete orbit of the sun when this anomaly was discovered in 1841.

you know what they found in 1846?

neptune. not nibiru.

then in 1930 they discovered pluto.

still no nibiru.

all their calculations didnt take neptune into factor with uranus' orbit. neptune is what affected its orbit. not nibiru/planet x.

let me look into 1983 now tho and see what that is all about.

Split 12-02-2013 03:31 PM

what this needs is to be modeled on paper.

uh-oh 12-02-2013 03:40 PM

split the nibiru theory is it passes close enough to wreak havoc on everything. the oceans would roll over the continents and all types of shit. just like the moon pulls the tides, it would do that kind of shit, something of its size could throw us out of orbit and us being pulled back in could easily shift the poles

in theory of course

but anything coming close to earth of any noticeable size is being tracked as we speak

the things we need to worry about are the much smaller objects, like asteroids and meteors

uh-oh 12-02-2013 03:50 PM

chyeahh this 1983 shit is utterly disappointing. i'm trying to find a normal site talking about it but i can only find the crazies

http://www.libertyforlife.com/nibiru...ru_in_1983.htm

it starts out with the whole uranus thing of 1841 and the search for planet x. they found planet x in 1846. its name is neptune. but lets just disregard that little fact to see what they have to say.

in 1983 they found objects with infrared and had no idea what it was. they said

"I believe it's one of these dark, young galaxies that we have never been able to observe before"

cool that sounds interesting

then it goes on to say nasa discovered a planet X, and posted it in newspapers, and then in 1984 said they didnt find anything. this is intriguing. i want to look into what they found.

then in the next sentence

"In 1984, the first Chemtrail tests were carried out."

WTF DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING LMAO

all i can do is sigh. i'll look back into it later, look for the actual newspaper articles and what nasa said, and what made them wrong/redact the statements. and i'll search a little deeper for it being talked about on sites that aren't full of tinfoil hat wearers

Witty 12-02-2013 03:54 PM

How close would this thing have to be for us to notice it and then how long would it be until we died?

I would like a few weeks notice at least.

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 04:02 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 219687)
in 1841 astronomers were baffled by uranus not moving as predicted within its orbit. this had them searching for "planet x"

that to me is intriguing. and im guessing is what you are referencing when i said all this came from sitchin. what i meant was a rogue planet that interferes with the happenings on earth. there is no earlier evidence prior to sitchin of anything like that. other than the planet that actually hit us, creating the moon.

also

it takes uranus 84 years to orbit the sun.

uranus was discovered in 1781

1781+84=1865

uranus hadn't even completed a complete orbit of the sun when this anomaly was discovered in 1841.

you know what they found in 1846?

neptune. not nibiru.

then in 1930 they discovered pluto.

still no nibiru.

all their calculations didnt take neptune into factor with uranus' orbit. neptune is what affected its orbit. not nibiru/planet x.

let me look into 1983 now tho and see what that is all about.

what about Jupiter though, perturbations in the planet Jupiter is what has always had us looking for Planet x, or the 10th planet. We had 8 and still was looking for Planet X until we found Pluto then we cheered like we had found it. Dude do yourself a favor, get some Jolly time popcorn, the marsh mellow kind, and a bottle of Welch's Chillers Fruit Punch, mozy on over to Youtube and check this out

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uyxXgj9mLUk

then take a few of these and call me in the morning:

http://rabbithole2.com/presentation/research.htm

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 04:03 PM

http://www.universetoday.com/105424/

free floating planet someone asked about, just googled it and found this one I hadn't seen before

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 04:05 PM

he speaks....
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 219700)
chyeahh this 1983 shit is utterly disappointing. i'm trying to find a normal site talking about it but i can only find the crazies

http://www.libertyforlife.com/nibiru...ru_in_1983.htm

it starts out with the whole uranus thing of 1841 and the search for planet x. they found planet x in 1846. its name is neptune. but lets just disregard that little fact to see what they have to say.

in 1983 they found objects with infrared and had no idea what it was. they said

"I believe it's one of these dark, young galaxies that we have never been able to observe before"

cool that sounds interesting

then it goes on to say nasa discovered a planet X, and posted it in newspapers, and then in 1984 said they didnt find anything. this is intriguing. i want to look into what they found.

then in the next sentence

"In 1984, the first Chemtrail tests were carried out."

WTF DOES THAT HAVE TO DO WITH ANYTHING LMAO

all i can do is sigh. i'll look back into it later, look for the actual newspaper articles and what nasa said, and what made them wrong/redact the statements. and i'll search a little deeper for it being talked about on sites that aren't full of tinfoil hat wearers

dunno who they are but the newspaper quote is on point

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 04:08 PM

I kept saying, WISE, I'm sorry, that was IRAS

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 04:11 PM

http://yowusa.com/planetx/2008/planetx-2008-05b/1.shtml

now this site is run by a guy who's written books on the subject, in terms of relevance here it doesn't matter imo. Familiarize yourself with Harrington, the guy who Sitchin himself said was on the right track before he started writing his Earth Chronicles series.

Chyeahhh!!! 12-02-2013 04:17 PM

my friends....which all of you are. Fret not, for you shall beholdeth (no Hush) this great thing I've spoken of in all of it's glory. Taketh to the skies and let thine eyes pilot thy letter boxes.

basically saying lookup, look away from that tablet, the girls ass...okay that's cool, but there's more important shit to look at

Just C 12-02-2013 04:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chyeahhh Guevara (Post 219713)
my friends....which all of you are. Fret not, for you shall beholdeth (no Hush) this great thing I've spoken of in all of it's glory. Taketh to the skies and let thine eyes pilot thy letter boxes.

basically saying lookup, look away from that tablet, the girls ass...okay that's cool, but there's more important shit to look at

What, now?

anime_boners 10-16-2014 02:15 PM

what was the great change on the 16th, again?


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:51 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.