Netcees

Netcees (http://netcees.org/index.php)
-   Discussion Board (http://netcees.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Vaccine makes woman krump endlessly (http://netcees.org/showthread.php?t=146778)

Destroyer 01-14-2021 09:57 AM

you’re a moron
these were tested prior to rollout like every vaccine ever

Amen 01-14-2021 10:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 798236)
imagine being alarmed by the handful of people effected by something that doesn't have bad effects on 99.9 percent of people

what fools am i right guys

Boom

Destroyer 01-14-2021 10:38 AM

not all of us are ok with actively killing our older relatives

Coop 01-14-2021 11:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 798256)
not all of us are ok with actively killing our older relatives

Man you the only elderly person everybody hates, stop trying to make this an ageist thing

Coop 01-14-2021 11:05 AM

By the way...

A Portuguese court just ruled the PCR test is INEFFECTIVE IN DETECTING COVID and likely has around a 97% false positive rate.

Look it up yourself.

It’s what I’ve been saying. The recommended cycle threshold for the PCR test is way too high, resulting in viruses being detected that aren’t covid. Hence, the high case numbers. Also why most people who are dying already got issues or are old as shit. Because most people aren’t catching covid, they are catching the flu.

Why else would the flu numbers be so significantly low this year compared to others?

Why are the “all cause mortality” numbers relatively the same this year compared to years past, globally and in the US?

All you gotta do is research how the PCR test works to connect the dots.

The creator of he test himself said it’s not meant to be used for virus detection and identification.

And if you refute this without knowing how a PCR test works, you’re just showing how stupid you are, and arguing with the very science you claim to trust

fraze 01-14-2021 11:15 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 798236)
imagine being alarmed by the handful of people effected by something that doesn't have bad effects on 99.9 percent of people

what fools am i right guys

you're right to be alarmed. it is alarming that some people are getting strange side effects. it should be investigated further and treated with seriousness. i'm not at all denying the side effects are real.

but if we're comparing relative danger of the vaccine and the corona virus, there isn't much of a comparison. be aware of the potential side effects, but if you want to get back to the "normal" version of America, the only path there is through mass vaccinations.

Coop 01-14-2021 11:17 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798259)
but if we're comparing relative danger of the vaccine and the corona virus, there isn't much of a comparison. be aware of the potential side effects, but if you want to get back to the "normal" version of America, the only path there is through mass vaccinations.

Your last sentence is propaganda.
Your last sentence is propaganda.
Your last sentence is propaganda.
Your last sentence is propaganda.
Your last sentence is propaganda.

You see how when something is repeated you have no choice but to acknowledge it? And if you are uneducated on the subject matter, it’s much easier to just agree and go along?

It’s what’s happening worldwide.

Research “the big lie”.

And his statement is a double entendre but I’m sure you knew that

fraze 01-14-2021 11:19 AM

originally i was going to responsively debunk Coops latest post. maybe note the fact that he failed to cite his sources once again. or that PCR tests are based on DNA which makes it pretty easy to tell different virus apart.
http://siarchives.si.edu/research/vi...C%20California.

then i took a second to think about it. won't we all be better of if the stupid people catch this?

Coop 01-14-2021 11:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798261)
originally i was going to responsively debunk Coops latest post. maybe note the fact that he failed to cite his sources once again. or that PCR tests are based on DNA which makes it pretty easy to tell different virus apart.
http://siarchives.si.edu/research/vi...C%20California.

then i took a second to think about it. won't we all be better of if the stupid people catch this?

Perfect example of fake smart.

Let me expose you

Because I fully believe you did one search on PCR test. Posted a random article without reading it, made a comment irrelevant to the subject matter, and tryna play it off like you debunked something.

How does this debunk cycle thresholds over 35 being a cause of false positives? Because that was my point? Go ahead smart guy

Destroyer 01-14-2021 11:27 AM

stfu closs

uh-oh 01-14-2021 11:28 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 798253)
you’re a moron
these were tested prior to rollout like every vaccine ever

no they weren't.

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798259)
you're right to be alarmed. it is alarming that some people are getting strange side effects. it should be investigated further and treated with seriousness. i'm not at all denying the side effects are real

im as alarmed by the vaccine as i am by covid. (not at all)

it isn't mandated so i could give a shit tbh. im never getting it so i have nothing to worry about and covid itself is nothing to worry about.

fraze 01-14-2021 11:30 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 798258)
The recommended cycle threshold for the PCR test is way too high, resulting in viruses being detected that aren’t covid.

If you understood how PCR tests work you would both know that this sentence is nonsense (pending your evidenciary support) and that this fact was made clear in the article I posted.

Coop 01-14-2021 11:36 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798265)
If you understood how PCR tests work you would both know that this sentence is nonsense (pending your evidenciary support) and that this fact was made clear in the article I posted.

I’m aware of your games and goal post moving, so allow me to reiterate and be specific:


So you are refuting that specific sentence, not my point, which is “the high cycle thresholds are causing high numbers of false positives”?



Oh btw...
Here’s the creator of the test himself, literally explaining “you can find almost anything in anybody”

Watch the whole thing, it’s short, but he puts in in layman’s terms for you

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rXm9kAhNj-4

Coop 01-14-2021 11:39 AM

Stop letting media control what you think.

You are allowed to question things without fear of being ostracized. You are allowed to look up information you don’t understand.


Here’s a little research roadmap for the fake smart people like fraze, or the people that want to know more about what’s going on and why:

1) Look up Kary Mullis (died last year), the guy WHO CREATED IT, and listen to his opinion on the test’s application for detecting viruses.

(Again, find the ACTUAL VIDEO, not an article discussing the video. That’s a trick I keep seeing people fall for.)

****just posted it for you


2) When researching the test and how it works, don’t skip over the part about cycles and cycle thresholds. It’s the very key to this whole thing

3) look up WHO’s recommended cycle threshold for covid testing, and compare that to what you just learned

4) look up the ruling a Portuguese court just made about the effi***y of the PCR test. Spoiler: THEY RULED IT WAS UNRELIABLE FOR DETECTING COVID WITH ~97% FALSE POSITIVE RATE (!!!)

5) once you’ve done all that, now look up all the experts worldwide saying the same about these PCR tests. And try to find those same doctors being covered by the main news stations. Hmmm

6) look up the cdcs definition of how they classify a death a covid death, and if they allow only confirmed cases, or confirmed AND PROBABLE cases, based off symptoms. And look up how much a hospital gets paid through Medicare for each code and how that works

7) spend some time looking for a scientific study that conclusively proves we can transfer covid asymptomatially. Then try to find studies that suggest we can’t.

8) look up the “all cause mortality” numbers and compare 2020 to previous years, globally and US. Notice how little difference there is. Why isnt there excess death, when we are dealing with the “worst pandemic ever” and 4K dying a day. And why are flu numbers down significantly this year? Could we be misattributing the flu as covid in some cases?

9) look up the psychological effects of wearing a mask in public. If you walk around in a society of masks, it makes everyone believe that there’s something scary out there. Look up being unable to read human expression, and isolating people and making them think they are a danger to loved ones, and how that relates to torture techniques

This just tip of the iceberg shit but I hope it provides some enlightenment in your life

Coop 01-14-2021 11:48 AM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_1Z8cSXI-Q

This is the best video I’ve come across that explains PCR testing, the importance of cycle thresholds, and how it leads to misinterpreting results.

uh-oh 01-14-2021 12:12 PM

nobodies gonna watch or look into any of that coop.

you gotta just throw in the towel and realize people believe what they want to believe on all sides.

Coop 01-14-2021 12:12 PM

In case you didn’t think there were doctors out there with “dissenting medical opinion” here you go. Looks like a ted talk full of doctors and she exposing hella shit. Surprised it’s not banned

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFntHpk1uok

Coop 01-14-2021 12:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 798270)
nobodies gonna watch or look into any of that coop.

you gotta just throw in the towel and realize people believe what they want to believe on all sides.

It isn’t for the people in the thread. The responses are 99% troll. It’s for the lurkers that want the knowledge and maybe haven’t heard or seen some of this before.

It’s also an opportunity for anyone to debunk like fraze is trying to.

It may not seem like it, but I’m very open to being wrong about anything, and changing my stance upon revelation of new information. I’m trying to find someone who actually can research objectively, and say more than just “what’s your source?!?” instead of actually intelligently debating the subject matter

fraze 01-14-2021 12:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 798272)
It may not seem like it, but I’m very open to being wrong about anything, and changing my stance upon revelation of new information. I’m trying to find someone who actually can research objectively, and say more than just “what’s your source?!?” instead of actually intelligently debating the subject matter

I'm the one moving goalposts?

You don't like me asking for sources?

You're open to new information?

That's confusing to me, pretty much every time I counter you with facts you go into personal attacks and try to insult my intelligence. I'm not sure which debating school you went to, but that's not generally how intelligent debates progress.

Coop 01-14-2021 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 798271)
In case you didn’t think there were doctors out there with “dissenting medical opinion” here you go. Looks like a ted talk full of doctors and she exposing hella shit. Surprised it’s not banned

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFntHpk1uok

Edit: You can only see this video from the link because it’s unlisted.

A shadowban is when they don’t delete the content, but they prevent it from coming up in search algorithms. Most people don’t even know they’re being shadowbanned. This happens across all social media.

When you listen to what she’s saying it makes sense why’d they do it.

She explains everything I’ve been saying way better than I could

Connect the dots

Destroyer 01-14-2021 12:49 PM

look hard enough, you will always find dissenting opinions
what’s the general consensus?
that’s the smart play

Coop 01-14-2021 12:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 798277)
look hard enough, you will always find dissenting opinions
what’s the general consensus?
that’s the smart play

That’s not the case in the betting industry. The smart play is bet against the public 9/10

600 years ago the general consensus was geocentric theory. You’d be considered a conspiracy theorist for thinking the earth revolves around the sun.

General consensus 100 years ago was slaves are a good thing to have.

Etc...

fraze 01-14-2021 01:26 PM

Most people also think its a bad idea to stick your fingers in an electrical socket. If you're betting against the public consensus 9 times out of 10, how are you still alive right now?

Coop 01-14-2021 01:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798280)
Most people also think its a bad idea to stick your fingers in an electrical socket. If you're betting against the public consensus 9 times out of 10, how are you still alive right now?

The betting industry dummy. Find me the odds for that bet first, I’d argue it doesn’t exist.

Which would prove you’re just making shit up again

Destroyer 01-14-2021 02:10 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 798278)
That’s not the case in the betting industry. The smart play is bet against the public 9/10

600 years ago the general consensus was geocentric theory. You’d be considered a conspiracy theorist for thinking the earth revolves around the sun.

General consensus 100 years ago was slaves are a good thing to have.

Etc...

hey, dumb shit
it’s the smart play even in betting
no risk... small reward
haven’t you ever even seen rounders? i bet you thought knisch was a bitch too

Hush 01-14-2021 02:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 798278)
That’s not the case in the betting industry. The smart play is bet against the public 9/10

600 years ago the general consensus was geocentric theory. You’d be considered a conspiracy theorist for thinking the earth revolves around the sun.

General consensus 100 years ago was slaves are a good thing to have.

Etc...

general consensus 1000 years ago was fire plus food good idea

Coop 01-14-2021 02:17 PM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFntHpk1uok


This video can’t be understated.

This is a doctor/lawyer, giving an hour speech. She represents a
“Volunteer physician organization, started specifically to combat the serious and life threatening disinformation campaign that has taken over America and the globe.”

The speech is what MSM would refer to as “dissenting medical opinion”

This is the information that gets scrubbed and blocked, it’s why the host has the video unlisted, comments disabled, and this only travels through personal link, and still has 200k views.

You owe it to yourself to listen to some of this.

Everything sourced and cited btw.

Timestamps: (I highly recommend watching from start to finish for context. She makes references later in the speech that wouldn’t make much sense if you didn’t listen throughout)

1:40 - NIH incorrect policy on treatment

3:20 - Renaming it from wuhan virus and why that’s abnormal

4:58 - suspicious hydroxychloroquine bashing as dangerous, when it’s a common otc drug in lots of places around the world and proven as treatment

20:51- The Lancet (most famous medical journal ) corruption. Published study in April about hydroxy. Independent doctors looked at it, said no way there’s 90k people in the study, and no ones heard of it. They ultimately retracted the article, (once a generation event!) and media buried the story . This same, now redacted, story was used as the source to ridicule trump when he praised the black doctor that said hydroxy was a cure.

23:40 - potential issues with the experimental biological agent (aka vax)

-mRNA (brand new), “investigational stage” which leads to legal protection
-complete failure of previous coronavirus vaccine attempt

(2002 epidemic of sars cov 1)
(This is 78% identical to sars cov 1)

-25:21 no independently published animal studies (one says they have, but not published)

-25:48 known complications
“Antibody dependent enhancement”
“Immune enhancement”
“Pathogenic priming”

“Instead of causing immunity, it causes a person to overreact in a negative way if they should be exposed to the virus”

-26:43 Saw this with prior cov 1 vaccine in 2005 with ferrets . Later they exposed sars cov 1 to ferrets in the wild, and they died. Could this happen with humans?

-27:43 Potential unknowns:
Fertility issues :

-28:36 Does it affect the syncytiotrophoblast , a layer on the placenta. It does when you’re sick with covid 19, and the vaccines kind of mimic having covid indefinitely

Does this agent have the same negative effect indefinitely? We don’t know

2 Europe ex-Pfizer executive filed petition with European equivalent of FDA, can’t approve it. Haven’t answered question about placenta and antibody dependent enhancement”

They claim it’s unsafe for child bearing age women until questions are answered

-30:16 pharmaceutical manufacturers are immune from liability (mostly profit-motivated)

-31:27 no proof that the agent stops transmission. Irrational! The surgeon general stated this on good morning America in December

What if they give 100m vaccines to everyone, and then everyone tests positive, they will say cases are rising and we can never go back to normal lol

-32:53 no proof this is reducing mortality

-33:15 we don’t know how long it lasts

-36:08 her studies on people of color and vaccines, and how it relates to the push for black people to get it
(38:31 starts exposing examples in media)

-39:06 using racial justice in a scientific matter is illogical

-42:58: pharmacovigilance tracking system (volunteering for a medical trial) established by DOD, will track for 2 years, handed to oracle and google to set up the data

-47:23 - vax distribution recommendation & reason based on age and health


You’re welcome. If you have even an ounce of intellectual curiosity you need to watch this video.

Amen 01-14-2021 02:32 PM

Ya’ll just love to argue on the Internet lol.

Objective 01-14-2021 03:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fraze (Post 798213)
It's funny to me that we're hyper focused on a handful of people (literally in the 10s or 100s) that have a survivable response to the vaccine, but you have no problem ignoring 4000s people dying every day.

Not to mention, it's not like it isn't widely known the vaccine isn't tested on a huge group of people yet, it is still in the stages of perfection. Serious question, do you guys really think they mainly test/give such a costly and important thing on mostly the elderly at first by chance? It's great if it works but also the least damaging on society if it doesn't. Definitely a conspiracy theory on my part, but hell, I don't think anyone can convince me otherwise of this

Lots of people have died and risked thei lives for vaccines to get the proper testing to get to this point in time where it's in a trial period for the public. It sucks that shit like this can happen but like you're saying, she isn't dead. If it is treatable, then damn, it's worth the side effect if the option is a very high risk of dying, or infecting others that will if they get it.

Side effects isn't surprising, it just sucks that it isn't as good as it can get yet. What's great is the courageous people taking the vaccine already now (and should know it is a risk this early), it's thanks to them we're moving forward with everything!

Sucks that the lady don't see it as such, and tells people not to take it instead of being an important voice in further development of it. And rooting on the people that work day and night risking to get infected themselves, some for free, with the virus to get a functional and predictable vaccine.

There's still a lot to be done, why this is surprising to some of you makes me scratch my head a little. What we're seeing here is a step in the right direction

Mac 01-14-2021 04:00 PM

I offer myself to slap some sense into you

dull boy 01-14-2021 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 798286)
hey, dumb shit
it’s the smart play even in betting
no risk... small reward
haven’t you ever even seen rounders? i bet you thought knisch was a bitch too

I need a blow job from Christy Turlington

Pharaohs Army 01-14-2021 05:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coop (Post 798267)
9) look up the psychological effects of wearing a mask in public. If you walk around in a society of masks, it makes everyone believe that there’s something scary out there. Look up being unable to read human expression, and isolating people and making them think they are a danger to loved ones, and how that relates to torture techniques


Dude I somewhat agree with you when you say to be cautious of this vaccine.

But then you take it up another level into the anti-masker zone.
Ridiculous. There IS something scary out there, COVID, as 400k Americans are dead.

The mask is the simplest most effective way on cutting down the spread. You can't whine about it.

Amen 01-14-2021 05:56 PM

If you have been vaccinated then why does wearing a mask matter?

Coop 01-14-2021 06:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Pharaohs Army (Post 798307)
Dude I somewhat agree with you when you say to be cautious of this vaccine.

But then you take it up another level into the anti-masker zone.
Ridiculous. There IS something scary out there, COVID, as 400k Americans are dead.

The mask is the simplest most effective way on cutting down the spread. You can't whine about it.

We all have opinions. Personally, I give two shits about masks. But there is a psychological effect on people there’s no doubt about it.

The “scary” comment should be taken as “everyone wearing a mask, even when healthy, makes people think that everyone else is infected/someone wrong with them, encouraging less human interaction” ... which leads to the aforementioned psychological problems over an extended period of time

Coop 01-14-2021 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Objective (Post 798298)
If it is treatable, then damn, it's worth the side effect if the option is a very high risk of dying, or infecting others that will if they get it.

1) not treatable so far, it hasn’t stopped for her since it started
2) “if the option is very high risk of dying” - it’s not for anyone under 65 without any underlying issues
3) “...or infecting others that will if they get it” - it has been publicly stated by Fauci, the Pfizer ceo, and other officials that the vax does NOT prevent transmission. That’s not what it’s designed for, though for whatever reason people think it is.


Ultimately, the issue with this is that it is an experimental biological agent, who’s creators can’t be sued, that was rushed at an historic pace, that was not tested on animals (extremely important), that we have no clue if it causes infertility in woman, and the chances of the average person being fine WITHOUT taking it is sky high.

Destroyer 01-14-2021 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amen (Post 798308)
If you have been vaccinated then why does wearing a mask matter?

it doesn’t.

Destroyer 01-14-2021 06:38 PM

More than 38,000 Americans have died of Covid-19 in the first two weeks of the new year.

Another 92,000 are projected to die from the virus over roughly the next three weeks, according to an ensemble forecast published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

it’s not bullshit, morons
take the fucking vaccine

Coop 01-14-2021 06:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 798312)
More than 38,000 Americans have died of Covid-19 in the first two weeks of the new year.

Another 92,000 are projected to die from the virus over roughly the next three weeks, according to an ensemble forecast published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

it’s not bullshit, morons
take the fucking vaccine

Do you know how many of those 38,000 received the vaccine? Do you know if it’s most of them, or barely any? All or none?

Hmmm


Another question


Do you think that if all 38,000 took the vaccine they’d all be alive?

If yes, what are you basing that on? If no, why take the vaccine then?

Answer those questions and you might realize why what you’re saying makes no sense

Amen 01-14-2021 06:47 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Destroyer (Post 798311)
it doesn’t.

Then why are they still mandating those who have been vaccinated to continue to wear masks?

Coop 01-14-2021 06:51 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Amen (Post 798314)
Then why are they still mandating those who have been vaccinated to continue to wear masks?

Clearly this is the next logical question. You are asking the right ones.

The answer of course, is because the vax doesn’t stop transmission. Meaning you are basically only getting it “on the off chance” you get the virus, “there’s a chance” the symptoms will be “slightly” more bearable .


But let’s see what his scripted, programmed, brainwashed answer will be .


My moneys on “so you can protect others!”


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:18 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
User Alert System provided by Advanced User Tagging (Lite) - vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2025 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.