Originally Posted by Objective (Post 136781)

Fuck that faggotry newage shit bitch. Y'all can call ''anonymous'' a ''movement'' or ''revolutionary'' all you want. If you guys really want to take this discussion all the way back to Japan and 2chan be my fucking guest. The idea behind being anonymous and expressing yourself freely has been around for ages and Christopher Poole created 4chan. Basically expressing yourself anonymously is being an anon. Fuck that movement shit. It's weak, it's cancerous it's everything that's wrong with /b/ <-- and that's what most of these faggots will tell ya, except for the influx of newfaggotry that has destroyed 4chan and split everyone up into /a/ and /v/ and the rest of the boards. Scientology crap was funny, I'll admit it, but that's all there ever is to it. It doesn't say anything about anonymous as a whole. Anonymous is INDIVIDUALS that's anonymous. Anonymous people and groups of anonymous hackers/whatever are just using that shit because that's what people listen to and got some sort of connection to it being a movement cuz it's all over the media and that's how they portray it etc.

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 136793)

post some meaningful shit "anonymous" has done

i'll wait

Originally Posted by God Of War (Post 136784)

it goes much deeper then what you are claimin

Originally Posted by Objective (Post 136802)

I know A LOT is going on and A LOT is going really fucking deep as well if you are referring to the hacking-crew etc. on IRC, there was one that got busted about a year ago or so as well that did some serious shit and had shit to do with the PS3info things getting leaked (if I'm not wrong). Either way, ask anyone, ask 4chan and anyone there or any of those hackers of yours. Anonymous is simply put people being anonymous, but that doesn't mean they can't form an alliance if random souls should cross paths and there's DEFINITELY more serious shit in the works. I never said they weren't serious or how deep it can go, but since the idea of a anonymous society where minds could be free without being judged by anything else than the posts and what they say/do regardles of gender, age or body type cuz that shit don't matter. But as a whole, anonymous = anyone that wants to be anonymous. Don't make it more complicated than it is.

Originally Posted by Boredom (Post 136803)

objective mad as fuck right now...

and @Objective u have to be ignorant as fuck thinking that it's just a bunch of random groups, and that it's not a collective that remains "anonymous"

Originally Posted by Objective (Post 136819)

Not mad, just eager, love a great debate. ^-^ Might come across as harsh/ignorant tho', I can see that. Perhaps to an extent anonymous can be looked upon as a collective, but in no way or form do they have to agree on the same shit. Anons fighting anons have happened.

Originally Posted by Objective (Post 136719)

Some of you seem to misunderstand the whole concept about anonymous. Actually a lot of people in this thread does.

Anonymous is simply put anyone who remains anonymous behind posts/threads or actions. NOTHING MORE.

This shit with people saying ''we are anonymous, we will get you'' is basically just some anonymous people that's standing for the same things and grouped up. Nothing more than that.

By saying anonymous can't do this or can't do that is basically saying; ''someone in the world can't do this.''

Anonymous is someone putting their dick inside a skull he stole from the catacombs and posts a picture of it because someone that got a certain postnumber would decide what he'd do with it and that was his suggestion.

@Aesthetic: How can you support every political party there ever was while being against them at the same time? Supporting ''anonymous'' doesn't work that way, you need to specify what you support or a certain anonymous operation (they usually go by names), if you want to make any sense.

Also: Expecting ''anonymous'' to do anything worthwhile is a shot in the dark, they make a shitload of threats because they could literally be anyone and the media loves them because it draws a shitload of views. It's better to just sit back and relax waiting for something to happen, or take part and join them, if you want to get any action at all.

Originally Posted by uh-oh (Post 136793)

post some meaningful shit "anonymous" has done

i'll wait

Originally Posted by Diode (Post 136825)

stop.

we are legion.

Originally Posted by Objective (Post 136829)

No.

Originally Posted by Diode (Post 136828)

getting those pieces of shit in ohio who raped that teenage girl and posted it all over the internet arrested

Originally Posted by Diode (Post 136823)

this dude said "seem like iran all over again"

you weren't even alive during iran contra wtf

Originally Posted by Boredom (Post 136836)

i was referencing in 2003 with the invasion due to the supposed weapons they had and the black flags the states set in place then acting on it, making it look like it's a certain issue but when in all reality they have ulterior motives.

Originally Posted by Boredom (Post 136850)

sorry my bad, i meant iraq.

Originally Posted by Aesthetic (Post 136855)

Iraq and Iran were practically the same scenario honestly; cant say syria is much different, I was really surprised @ what anonymous had to say though. Actually accusing the U.S. of instigating WW3, that's a bold conspiracy statement to share with the world.

I mean if 1 nuke goes off we are fucked, the Tritium leakage in japan is already killing the pacific. The radiation would be catastrophic.

Originally Posted by Diode (Post 136862)

no they weren't at all.

iran contra was a situation where they held american hostages for several days threatening to execute them. conspiracy theories abound regarding how it led to the islamic revolution and the fall of the ayatollah, but there was a tangible threat to american life and liberty.

iraq.. not so much. saddam was a brutal, genocidal dictator - no doubt about that. his involvement as a threat to american lives, however, was nonexistent. he was actually our BFF during iran contra and we funded and weaponized iraq as a means to keep revolutionary iran in check.

stop talking?

Originally Posted by Objective (Post 137035)

@uh-oh, power in numbers helps a lot. It was probably only a small part of their scheme to get people in to use the Low orbit ion Canon as well. Dunno how successful that shit was, most of the shit they do aint helpful at all, but you shouldn't underestimate the shit they can do. Peeps be mad talented and you wouldn't want them after you either, they've ruined the lives of many as well.

Originally Posted by Objective (Post 137035)

@uh-oh, power in numbers helps a lot. It was probably only a small part of their scheme to get people in to use the Low orbit ion Canon as well. Dunno how successful that shit was, most of the shit they do aint helpful at all, but you shouldn't underestimate the shit they can do. Peeps be mad talented and you wouldn't want them after you either, they've ruined the lives of many as well.