Why did seth close it in the first place??

smh @ thread

@Bags: The message he wrote in the thread before he closed it was this:

So I guess his reason for closing it was that he thought the thread was stupid. Nothing else. And re-opened it when I made this thread cuz he realized he probably did something stupid as there might have been others that was amused by the thread. Idk if that's why tho', but it's my best guess.

Feel free to correct me @Seth Scheinberg.

I thought I said why I did it in this thread lmao

It seemed to have died out, didn't see why anyone would need it to be open

And the other mods were wondering about black enveloping threads so I used it as a test thread, feel asleep before reopening it

It ended up being a dumb thread though, had great potential

Lol wtf kinda bullshit answer was that.....

Theres a whole bunch of threads on page 2 that have died out....y ont u got lock them too? Lol

Now you're just fishing for conflict Bagsworth

Nobody got time fuh page 2

I'm not sure whether I missed something amazing or meaningless - which is meaningful in and of itself. This thread provided me with more questions than answers, which if anything, sounds like a successful expansion on whatever you were trying to do with the story/riddles.

Again, i have no clue what this is about, but it's clear it meant something to someone when heads are active in a thread which talks about the original thread.