You're a no-name around here.

There is nothing attached to your name but disappointment, contempt, and the thought that you're a poor writing self-obsessed faggot with a hatred for women that say "no", faggot.

The problem isn't that you're not good. We're very happy to help. You have potential. We all were where you are at some point. The problem is that your ego dwarfs your ability at a level rarely seen, and it shows in every post. So if you do come back, cut the crap.

You just made yourself look stupid(at least to anyone with any integrity).

Smh

I'm bored of you already.

Pink slip?

Any topic/alias you want to post under. Make it due tomorrow Sweden time.

It happens a lot. Sometimes it's easier to leave a generic, vague compliment than truly break down someones problems and try to help.

See this topic as an example;

http://netcees.co/showthread.php?t=45223

Do you think your intimidating me? Lol.
And as always you are incorrect.

lmao did you think you were intimidating when Striktas sister told you no and you forced yourself on her regardless?

He evaluated your writing and your writing alone

Did you miss the parts where he talked entirely about your verse?

They are fair and accurate criticisms

Perhaps you could interpret your piece in an entirely positive manner, but that isn't bias. It is opinion. It is grounded in literal details

Natural, that feed was unbiased and very constructive. Although cake has been a dick to you, it's only because the way you react makes you an easy target. Stay writing, I'll be back to feed this

One person who spoke half truth. Wow.
he problem isn't that you're not good. ←Correct.
The problem is you're ego dwarfs your ability at a level rarely seen ←Incorrect

I never claimed to be top teir. I never said I was better than everybody.
I don't go around acting like I'm God and when I do get legit feed
I return that favor legitimately to them if its possible.

I'm humble about my abilities as a writer.

I don't agree.
I think he came in with the intent to discredit my writing...
And did it like a back handed compliment in the sense

It'd seemingly look nice he's feeding my piece(compliment) but no matter what he's going to discredit every single piece I ever do(back hand)

Cake has never participated in the COTR phenomenon, he is regarded as top tier, he spent a long time breaking down your writing, you have never really insulted him ad don't "board"

He has no motivation or predisposition for bias

You are being irrational unless you can prove some aspect of his feed was dishonest or unfair compared to his other feed

There is no hard proof for any argument in this conversation. I can speak logically..(which I am) and you can continue to claim I'm not and that I'm wrong.
Its a never ending cycle(unless of coarse we just agree to disagree or I'm banned).

You're not getting banned.

I told you in another piece you have posted that I thought your writing needed work and you asked me to explain. You obviously enjoy dropping Open Mics as you've written a ton of them recently. I have my own preconceptions of what is a 'good' topical/open mic piece and that's what fueled all of the criticisms I wrote. You can say I'm wrong. It's my opinion. I do think if you took some of my criticisms to heart your writing would improve. But I'm far from perfect so do you. All apologies for making this into a discussion at the expense of further feed.

agreeing to disagree implies there is no.such thing as objective truth

and technically, i am being logical because I am pointing to what is on the page and you are drawing conclusions without any premises

isn't it possible that Pancake was merely harsh?

Isnt it possible that pancake may be feeding me negatively to get a rise out of me?

It isnt in his character. He's an honest feeder.

Anyways. This thread has enough posts. I will be retreating to my quarters shortly

Ain't much I can say to that...except we leave off where we started
In disagreement.

But ok.

Kudos on me