Sup with that trailer V? I saw the 911 connection

Makes you wonder how long the predicative programming has been going on yes?

he speaks....
 

lol yea no doubt. Had the scene in Escape from New York, how many watches or clocks on 9:11 in movies? Lone Gunmen ep, caution 9'11 clearance in T2, Neo birthdate in The Matrix, even in Enemy of the State Jon Voight's character's birthday was 9/11. Munich terror attack by black September on September 5-6 or 9/11 in 1972 or 91 (think computer code sequence repeat (0's and 1's) and 29 (2+9=11) is 9/11/01. Call it predictive programming, esoteric resonance, or code repeating in a simulation, whatever have you, certainly is interesting IMO.

is it possible that there is also a good force? that uses predicative programming to guide? and not just a malevolent force that gets off on puttiing the symbols in front of us?

he speaks....
 

I'm under the impression that there are good forces, bad forces, and neutral universal forces behind them, with the universal forces representing the numerical code sequence (simulated). The evil forces by some sort of ritualistic law have to inform the public of intended events without disclosing the nature of the events. The good forces are opposed to the evil nature of said events and attempt disclosure through clandestine measures and maybe even abruptly thwarting plans of said events (shutting down of nuclear facilities, launches, etc)

I think it's just a war of energy and vibrational frequencies at the nitty gritty. Hence my always interjections of extra dimensional influences during these types of discussions. We're ever evolving conduits of energy from places not seen attempting to manifest itself here for better or for worse.

This is what you would hear if you sat and listened to the homeless guy on the corner talk to himself.

he speaks....
 

Or a guy on his couch in his house posting a reply on the computer.

Sure. Not really the point, but yeah.

Dull boy: what is your foundation?

You’ll have to be more specific.

Is this *** talk for seducing?

Ok. What is your philosophical base? What is your world view. Because I am trying not better understand you.

My philosophical base and world view would be arduous to describe. I’m sure you can make a determination based on what you’ve read that I’ve posted. It’s not my intention to be dodgy, but these questions are too broad for me to answer without putting more thought into it than I’d care for.

What is your philosophical base and world view?

My philosophical base and world view would be arduous to describe. I’m sure you can make a determination based on what you’ve read that I’ve posted. It’s not my intention to be dodgy, but these questions are too broad for me to answer without putting more thought into it than I’d care for.

What is your philosophical base and world view?

You have 94 more posts to go! Keep at it!

why are you so weird, always focused on little stuff because you don't have big picture responses

you mean because you didn't address us personally? your intent was clear call it whatever you want lol idc


see thru is see thru

As you get older, you'll find it isn't worth your time continuing to debate with those that feel their circular logic is infallible. I've already explained the problems with your premise numerous times. You continue to believe in fairytales. There's no big picture response for someone who can't see the forest for the trees.

Yo - you guys is telling me that adrenochrome makes you rich?

give me a short summary of your belief lol. yall are crazy.

and don't get me wrong this is coming from the biggest conspiracy theorist bboys and netcees has ever known. ask Diode.

but yall are crazy for this

@Diode i mean i'm 30 and i talk to people with completely opposing views day in and day out. i move people. your approach stops constructive discourse in its tracks and is counterproductive on multiple levels. it's important to make people feel heard and to not attack someone's character or to group them and generalize mid otherwise civil discourse. you've literally explained nothing wrong with the premise outside of the legitimacy of adrenochrome which is maybe the least important part. i don't believe you're that entrenched in your bubble to think the list i rattled off are fairytales, but if so, oh well. most people, especially your fuckin ass, feel their logic is infallible. v & i were arguing the probability of a theory, no more no less.

delz you still livin at home or you lampin in the hamptons finally