Originally Posted by Godcomplex
(Post 541406)
If you presented an actual rationale then I would consider it, but what you call logic is simply you working on an emotional current, from which you operate and fuel with feel good chemicals about yourself and your reality by demeaning others. Calling others retards just points to you operating from a non-logical standpoint. And I fear that you do not understand logic sadly, for you go to easy blank open statements to try to justify your viewpoint, such as "new age" slanders. Arguing with you would be pointless, but I'll do it just to see what comes about.
Your transparent rationale would be laughed in most academic circles, especially your slanders that have no basis. While, you are certainly entitled to your opinion about the level of skill of others, your condescension is that condescension and nothing else. Thinking it somehow help others shows how far you will fool yourself into propagating your persona you feed by looking down on others continually.
In essence, you assume too much and it gets in the way of your clarity. Thus, you become and embody the very same product of that which you disdain, someone who is ignorant because they can't see their own faults. And I'm afraid no book can lift you from you this curse, and I'm quite certain that I am just as an avid reader than you are, if not more. But, we read different things I'm sure, I am an academic and your "logic" is composed of calling others retards, which is a stance based on nothing but propositions and not argumentation based on sound logic.
In the academic world, we value critique, but critique that is based on showing others deeper insight on the miscalculations or misunderstanding of certain ideas or principles, here all I see you spewing disparage, what can be gained from this, but it is a fine example of good trolling.
|
